tasks we are not interested in such
statements and in fact like to see those eliminated.
Niels
> From: okramma...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:17:27 -0600
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges in Neo4j
>
> Hey,
>
> > I think a trave
Hey,
> I think a traversal should in principal be performed with a query language
> that is not turing complete so we can guarantee termination.
Turning completeness is not the lower bound for non-guaranteed termination. You
can't guarantee completion in a regular language when your "String" (d
queries asked.
> Niels
>
>
> > From: peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com
> > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:19:00 +0200
> > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> > Subject: [Neo4j] Hyperedges in Neo4j
> >
> > Hi folks,
> > I took a discussion over at Tinkerpop as th
. This is especially
important in a REST architecture where we can't control the type of queries
asked.
Niels
> From: peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com
> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:19:00 +0200
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: [Neo4j] Hyperedges in Neo4j
>
> Hi folks,
>
Hi folks,
I took a discussion over at Tinkerpop as the excuse to put in an example of
modeling and traversing Hyperedges in neo4j (in this case with Gremlin). Of
course this is nowhere near Nils thinking, but for simple cases this might
serve as a pattern.
http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/gr
5 matches
Mail list logo