Marko,
Thanks for the link, it's obviously very relevant to what we're doing!
We've talked a ton about trying to solve some of the problems it looks like
k-reef was designed to, but weren't quite ambitious enough :)
We have an alpha release coming up- would you be interested in seeing what
we hav
Hey,
Matt: This isn't related to this thread, but I noticed you are from Scholar.ly.
I thought you might like this:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1594
Go Canucks!,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Dec 4, 2011, at 12:58 AM, Matt Luongo wrote:
> Well, I had already started writing this
Well, I had already started writing this before I saw your response- so, if
you do decide down the road that you care more about immediate performance
than keeping DRY... ;)
g.setMaxBufferSize(0) //turn on tx handlings
g.startTransaction()
found = g.idx('node_auto_index')[[name:'uni..
Thanks Matt.
Yeah. I think the transaction API is in making. Would be great addition.
The server-side plugin will definitely work, but I personally prefer to use one
way of doing things. At least until I will start speaking neo4j natively :)
Cheers,
Dmytrii
http://www.ApproachE.com
On 04/12/2
I've run into this problem, and resorted to using the Gremlin/Groovy over
REST (via the server-included plugin).
There really isn't a way to transactionally express a conditional (or
get-or-create) like that over the vanilla REST API, though I'm sure it's in
the works.
--
Matt Luongo
Co-Founder,
5 matches
Mail list logo