On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Matei Zaharia
wrote:
> That’s a good idea too, maybe we can change CallSiteInfo to do that.
>
I've filed an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2035
Matei
>
> On Jun 4, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Daniel Darabos <
> daniel.dara...@lynxanalytics.com> wrote:
That’s a good idea too, maybe we can change CallSiteInfo to do that.
Matei
On Jun 4, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Daniel Darabos
wrote:
> Oh, this would be super useful for us too!
>
> Actually wouldn't it be best if you could see the whole call stack on the UI,
> rather than just one line? (Of course
Oh, this would be super useful for us too!
Actually wouldn't it be best if you could see the whole call stack on the
UI, rather than just one line? (Of course you would have to click to expand
it.)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:38 AM, John Salvatier wrote:
> Ok, I will probably open a Jira.
>
>
> O
Ok, I will probably open a Jira.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Matei Zaharia
wrote:
> You can use RDD.setName to give it a name. There’s also a creationSite
> field that is private[spark] — we may want to add a public setter for that
> later. If the name isn’t enough and you’d like this, plea
You can use RDD.setName to give it a name. There’s also a creationSite field
that is private[spark] — we may want to add a public setter for that later. If
the name isn’t enough and you’d like this, please open a JIRA issue for it.
Matei
On Jun 3, 2014, at 5:22 PM, John Salvatier wrote:
> I h
I have created some extension methods for RDDs in RichRecordRDD and these
are working exceptionally well for me.
However, when looking at the logs, its impossible to tell what's going on
because all the line number hints point to RichRecordRDD.scala rather than
the code that uses it. For example:
