Hi Josh,
I was trying out decision tree ensemble using bagging. Here I am spiting
the input using random split and training tree for each of the split. Here
is sample code:
val bags : Int = 10
val models : Array[DecisionTreeModel] =
training.randomSplit(Array.fill(bags)(1.0 / bags)).map {
OK, I still wonder whether it's not better to make one big model. The
usual assumption is that the user's identity isn't predictive per se.
If every customer in your shop is truly unlike the others, most
predictive analytics goes out the window. It's factors like our
location, income, etc that are
Sean,
Thanks for the response. Is there some subtle difference between one model
partitioned by N users or N models per each 1 user? I think I'm missing
something with your question.
Looping through the RDD filtering one user at a time would certainly give
me the response that I am hoping for
You are right... my code example doesn't work :)
I actually do want a decision tree per user. So, for 1 million users, I
want 1 million trees. We're training against time series data, so there are
still quite a few data points per users. My previous message where I
mentioned RDDs with no length
A model partitioned by users?
I mean that if you have a million users surely you don't mean to build a
million models. There would be little data per user right? Sounds like you
have 0 sometimes.
You would typically be generalizing across users not examining them in
isolation. Models are built
You just mean you want to divide the data set into N subsets, and do
that dividing by user, not make one model per user right?
I suppose you could filter the source RDD N times, and build a model
for each resulting subset. This can be parallelized on the driver. For
example let's say you divide
I've got a data set of activity by user. For each user, I'd like to train a
decision tree model. I currently have the feature creation step implemented
in Spark and would naturally like to use mllib's decision tree model.
However, it looks like the decision tree model expects the whole RDD and