Re: [uml-devel] synchronous hostfs

2005-01-08 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 30 December 2004 05:16, Michael Richardson wrote: > > "Blaisorblade" == Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'm running 2.4.26-um3. I happen to be running hostfs with NFS > >> underneath. I get core dumps from my application, and I want to > >> gdb them outs

Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.10 command line longer than 512 characters

2005-01-08 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 07 January 2005 12:02, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE wrote: > >> You have a patch at: > >> http://kernel.umbrella.ro/kpatches/uml-extend-cmd-line-limits.patch > > Thank you very much. Is this patch coing to find its way into mainstram > > UML at some point or do I have to look for it in the

Re: [uml-devel] Re: UML fills /tmp irreversibly (2.6.9-bb4 on SuSE 9.2)

2005-01-08 Thread Paolo Giarrusso
On Monday 03 January 2005 15:31, Armin M. Warda wrote: > Hi Gerd, > On Monday 03 January 2005 14:34, you wrote: > > host or uml kernel fix? URL? Havn't tracked stuff at all over > > xmas holidays ... > > Must be a host-Kernel fix, not a uml-kernel fix, because um-kernel > 2.6.9-bb4 running on

[uml-devel] How stable is hostfs (and UML in general)?

2005-01-08 Thread Rob Landley
I want to use UML because I'm building a little uclibc-based distro that has a problem when the system it's building on has a kernel older than the one it's building. I'm testing the build under knoppix (2.6.7 kernel) and building a C library against Maszur's 2.6.9 or 2.6.10 kernel headers, and

Re: [uml-devel] How stable is hostfs (and UML in general)?

2005-01-08 Thread Frank Sorenson
Rob Landley wrote: Rob, I may not be able to answer all your questions, but I may be able to offer a few pointers. For the UML kernel version, the stock 2.6.x kernel is getting better, but still isn't the most stable and reliable kernel. Right now, the most stable I've found is using 2.6.9 from k