[uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch?

2005-01-16 Thread Rob Landley
I'm under the impression blaisorblade isn't going to continue his "stable" tree now that patches are flowing easily into main, but the hang I'm seeing in 2.6.9-bb persists (I tried mem=64M but that didn't help either). Probably something small and simple to fix, but I haven't tracked it down ye

Re: [uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch?

2005-01-16 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I can't get 2.6.11-rc1 ARCH=um to compile. (Fixed the first build > break to receive a more elaborate one shortly thereafter, which is > not a good sign...) > > Is there a recommended tree I should be looking at? rc1-mm1 builds and runs fine.

Re: [uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch?

2005-01-16 Thread Frank Sorenson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeff Dike wrote: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: | |>I can't get 2.6.11-rc1 ARCH=um to compile. (Fixed the first build |>break to receive a more elaborate one shortly thereafter, which is |>not a good sign...) |> |>Is there a recommended tree I should be lo