On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:23:19AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> H, can you please give a shot at the following one? Thank you.
I applied this patch on top of stock 2.6.35.5 as usual (no other patches)
and tested on my maverick image as before. I ran a fsck.ext3 on the
filesystem image from the
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I think we need to find the real fix here, just disabling merging
> is not a fix (it's just a nasty work-around for the real bug).
>
Jens,
Do you have an idea which parts of the code are buggy?
--
Cheers,
//richard
-
Hello, sorry about chiming in later. I was off last week.
On 09/29/2010 08:34 AM, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:21:07PM +0900, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> This seems to imply that the original commit pin pointed is not
>> the only issue we have in that code atm.
>>
>> I think we need to
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:37:36PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, sorry about chiming in later. I was off last week.
No problem, I'm eager to test patches to fix this.
> I think we're on the right track. The problem with Jens' patch was
> that it didn't consider the fact that blk_end_request
On 10/04/2010 09:51 PM, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:37:36PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello, sorry about chiming in later. I was off last week.
>
> No problem, I'm eager to test patches to fix this.
>
>> I think we're on the right track. The problem with Jens' patch was
>> t
