[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: fence_sanlock and pacemaker

>>> "Laurent B." schrieb am 27.08.2015 um 08:06 in Nachricht <55dea8cc.3080...@qmail.re>: > Hello, > >> You’d have to build it yourself, but sbd could be an option >> > > do you have any clue on how to install it on redhat (6.5) ? I installed > the gluster glue package and the sbd package (provi

Re: [ClusterLabs] fence_sanlock and pacemaker

> On 27 Aug 2015, at 4:06 pm, Laurent B. wrote: > > Hello, > >> You’d have to build it yourself, but sbd could be an option >> > > do you have any clue on how to install it on redhat (6.5) ? I installed > the gluster glue package and the sbd package (provided by OpenSUSE) but’ don’t do that.

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: resource-stickiness

>>> Andrew Beekhof schrieb am 27.08.2015 um 00:20 in Nachricht : >> On 26 Aug 2015, at 10:09 pm, Rakovec Jost wrote: >> >> Sorry one typo: problem is the same >> >> >> location cli-prefer-aapche aapche role=Started 10: sles2 > > Change the name of your constraint. > The 'cli-prefer-’ pr

Re: [ClusterLabs] fence_sanlock and pacemaker

Hello, > You’d have to build it yourself, but sbd could be an option > do you have any clue on how to install it on redhat (6.5) ? I installed the gluster glue package and the sbd package (provided by OpenSUSE) but now I'm stuck. The stonith resource creation give me an error saying that the sbd

Re: [ClusterLabs] [corosync] Question: Duration of DC election

> On 25 Aug 2015, at 7:46 pm, Stefan Wenk wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm performing downtime measurement tests using corosync version 2.3.0 and > pacemaker version 1.1.12 under RHEL 6.5 MRG and although not recommended, I > tuned the corosync configuration settings to following insane values: > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] resource-stickiness

> On 26 Aug 2015, at 10:09 pm, Rakovec Jost wrote: > > Sorry one typo: problem is the same > > > location cli-prefer-aapche aapche role=Started 10: sles2 Change the name of your constraint. The 'cli-prefer-’ prefix is reserved for “temporary” constraints created by the command line tool

Re: [ClusterLabs] fence_sanlock and pacemaker

> On 27 Aug 2015, at 4:11 am, Laurent B. wrote: > > Gents, > > I'm trying to configure a HA cluster with RHEL 6.5. Everything goes well > except the fencing. The cluster's node are not connected to the > management lan (where stand all the iLO/UPS/APC devices) and it's not > planned to connecti

Re: [ClusterLabs] multiple drives looks like balancing but why and causing troubles

On 26/08/15 02:46 PM, Streeter, Michelle N wrote: > I have a two node cluster. Both nodes are virtual and have five shared > drives attached via sas controller. For some reason, the cluster shows > both nodes have half the drives started on them. Not sure if this is > called split brain or not.

[ClusterLabs] multiple drives looks like balancing but why and causing troubles

I have a two node cluster. Both nodes are virtual and have five shared drives attached via sas controller. For some reason, the cluster shows both nodes have half the drives started on them. Not sure if this is called split brain or not. It definitely looks load balancing. But I did not

[ClusterLabs] fence_sanlock and pacemaker

Gents, I'm trying to configure a HA cluster with RHEL 6.5. Everything goes well except the fencing. The cluster's node are not connected to the management lan (where stand all the iLO/UPS/APC devices) and it's not planned to connecting them to this lan. With these constraints, I figured out that

[ClusterLabs] Antw: NFS exports

>>> "Streeter, Michelle N" schrieb am >>> 26.08.2015 um 15:42 in Nachricht <9a18847a77a9a14da7e0fd240efcafc2504...@xch-phx-501.sw.nos.boeing.com>: > I have been using linux /etc/exports to put my exports for my cluster and it > works fine this way as long as every node has this done. > > I trie

[ClusterLabs] NFS exports

I have been using linux /etc/exports to put my exports for my cluster and it works fine this way as long as every node has this done. I tried to add the exportfs resource but this keeps failing. Is it preferred that we use /etc/exports or the exportfs for pacemaker? Michelle Streeter ASC2 MCS -

Re: [ClusterLabs] resource-stickiness

Sorry one typo: problem is the same location cli-prefer-aapche aapche role=Started 10: sles2 to: location cli-prefer-aapche aapche role=Started inf: sles2 It keep change to infinity. my configuration is: node sles1 node sles2 primitive filesystem Filesystem \ params fstype=

[ClusterLabs] resource-stickiness

Hi list, I have configure simple cluster on sles 11 sp4 and have a problem with "auto_failover off". The problem is that when ever I migrate resource group via HAWK my configuration change from: location cli-prefer-aapche aapche role=Started 10: sles2 to: location cli-ban-aapche-on-sles1 a

Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync GitHub vs. dev list

Jan Friesse writes: >> Since Corosync is hosted on GitHub, I wonder if it's enough to submit >> pull requests/issues/patch comments there to get the developers > > Yes, gh is enough. Thanks for the clarification and the quick action! -- Regards, Feri. __

Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync GitHub vs. dev list

Ferenc, Hi, Since Corosync is hosted on GitHub, I wonder if it's enough to submit pull requests/issues/patch comments there to get the developers Yes, gh is enough. Regards, Honza attention, or should I also post to develop...@clusterlabs.org? __