Re: [ClusterLabs] [ClusterLabs Developers] Problem with fence_virsh in RHEL 6 - selinux denial

2015-09-09 Thread Digimer
I've created an rhbz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261711 digimer On 08/09/15 11:04 PM, Digimer wrote: > ere is my cluster.conf, in case it matters: > > > [root@node1 ~]# cat /etc/cluster/cluster.conf > > > > > > >

[ClusterLabs] [Announce] clufter-0.50.4 released

2015-09-09 Thread Jan Pokorný
I am happy to announce that clufter-0.50.4, a tool/library for transforming/analyzing cluster configuration formats, has been released and published (incl. signature using my 60BCBB4F5CD7F9EF key):

Re: [ClusterLabs] Coming in 1.1.14: Fencing topology based on node attribute

2015-09-09 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Andrew Beekhof writes: > > word of warning, i’m in the process of changing it to avoid overloading the > ‘target’ attribute and exposing quoting issues stemming from people’s use of > ‘=' > >https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/ea4fc1c > Thanks, I'll fix it. Cheers, Kristoffer > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Coming in 1.1.14: Fencing topology based on node attribute

2015-09-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
> On 9 Sep 2015, at 7:45 pm, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > > Hi, > > Ken Gaillot writes: > >> Pacemaker's upstream master branch has a new feature that will be part >> of the eventual 1.1.14 release. >> >> Fencing topology is used when a node requires multiple fencing devices >> (in combinati

Re: [ClusterLabs] Coming in 1.1.14: Fencing topology based on node attribute

2015-09-09 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Hi, Ken Gaillot writes: > Pacemaker's upstream master branch has a new feature that will be part > of the eventual 1.1.14 release. > > Fencing topology is used when a node requires multiple fencing devices > (in combination or as fallbacks). Currently, topologies must be > specified by node name