Re: [ClusterLabs] heartbeat/pacemaker: stonith-ng does a broadcast that doesnt reach it back resulting stonith_async_timeout_handler() called

2015-10-15 Thread Shyam
Hi Dejan, Thanks a lot for your input! I cherry picked this commit & this solves the problem. I will raise a ubuntu launchpad bug for them to pull this correction in trusty stable. Thanks! --Shyam On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:3

Re: [ClusterLabs] multiple action= lines sent to STDIN of fencing agents - why?

2015-10-15 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 10/15/2015 06:25 AM, Adam Spiers wrote: > I inserted some debugging into fencing.py and found that stonithd > sends stuff like this to STDIN of the fencing agents it forks: > > action=list > param1=value1 > param2=value2 > param3=value3 > action=list > > where paramX and va

Re: [ClusterLabs] multiple action= lines sent to STDIN of fencing agents - why?

2015-10-15 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 15/10/15 12:25 +0100, Adam Spiers wrote: > I inserted some debugging into fencing.py and found that stonithd > sends stuff like this to STDIN of the fencing agents it forks: > > action=list > param1=value1 > param2=value2 > param3=value3 > action=list > > where paramX and v

[ClusterLabs] multiple action= lines sent to STDIN of fencing agents - why?

2015-10-15 Thread Adam Spiers
I inserted some debugging into fencing.py and found that stonithd sends stuff like this to STDIN of the fencing agents it forks: action=list param1=value1 param2=value2 param3=value3 action=list where paramX and valueX come from the configuration of the primitive for the fenci

Re: [ClusterLabs] heartbeat/pacemaker: stonith-ng does a broadcast that doesnt reach it back resulting stonith_async_timeout_handler() called

2015-10-15 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:31:40PM +0530, Shyam wrote: > Hi all, > > We were previously using Pacemaker 1.1.6 on Ubuntu Precise. We are shifting > to Ubuntu Trusty & it has Pacemaker 1.1.10. > > We have our own STONITH resource & with the pacemaker upgrade this is > broken. The problem that