[ClusterLabs] Ubuntu 16.04 - Only binds on 127.0.0.1 then fails until reinstall

2017-05-03 Thread James Booth
Hey guys, Sorry for the repeat mails, but I had issues subscribing list time (Looks like it has worked successfully now!). Anywho, I'm really desperate for some help on my issue in http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2017-April/005495.html - I can recap the info in this thread and

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

2017-05-03 Thread Albert Weng
Hi Marek, Thanks your reply. On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Marek Grac wrote: > > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Albert Weng > wrote: > >> >> Hi Marek, >> >> thanks for your quickly responding. >> >> According to you opinion, when i type "pcs status" then i saw the >> following result of

Re: [ClusterLabs] Clusterlabs Summit 2017 (Nuremberg, 6-7 September) - Hotels and Topics

2017-05-03 Thread Adam Spiers
Kristoffer Gronlund wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Here's a quick update on the summit happening at the SUSE office in > Nuremberg on September 6-7. [snipped] > I am also happy to say that Adam Spiers from the SUSE Cloud team will be > attending the summit, and hopefully I can convince him to presen

Re: [ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in Primary Node even though its interface went down

2017-05-03 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 05/03/2017 02:43 AM, pillai bs wrote: > Hi Experts!!! > > Am having two node setup for HA (Primary/Secondary) with > separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected > behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take > in-charge (meanin

Re: [ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in primary node

2017-05-03 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 05/03/2017 02:30 AM, pillai bs wrote: > Hi Experts!!! > > Am having two node HA setup (Primary/Secondary) with > separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected > behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take > in-charge (meaning in

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Resources still retains in Primary Node even though its interface went down

2017-05-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> pillai bs schrieb am 03.05.2017 um 09:43 in >>> Nachricht : > Hi Experts!!! > > Am having two node setup for HA (Primary/Secondary) with > separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected > behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to

Re: [ClusterLabs] Is there an Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) associated with Corosyn?

2017-05-03 Thread Kai Dupke
On 05/02/2017 08:49 PM, Fry, George H wrote: > Is there an Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) associated with > Corosyn? AFAIK such can only be requested by a company. Of course SUSE has done all needed ECR related tasks for SUSE Linux Enterprise, the HA extension etc. Best regards,

[ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in Primary Node even though its interface went down

2017-05-03 Thread pillai bs
Hi Experts!!! Am having two node setup for HA (Primary/Secondary) with separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take in-charge (meaning initially the VIP will point the primary node, so u

[ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in primary node

2017-05-03 Thread pillai bs
Hi Experts!!! Am having two node HA setup (Primary/Secondary) with separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take in-charge (meaning initially the VIP will point the primary node, so user