Re: [ClusterLabs] Early VM resource migration

2015-12-17 Thread Klechomir
Hi Ken, I've tried with and without colocation. The rule was: colocation bla2 inf: VM_VM1 AA_Filesystem_CDrive1 In both cases the VM_VM1 tries to live migrate back the coming after standby node while cloned AA_Filesystem_CDrive1 isn't up on it yet. Same result with pacemaker 1.14-rc2 Regards,

Re: [ClusterLabs] Early VM resource migration

2015-12-16 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 12/16/2015 10:30 AM, Klechomir wrote: > On 16.12.2015 17:52, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> On 12/16/2015 02:09 AM, Klechomir wrote: >>> Hi list, >>> I have a cluster with VM resources on a cloned active-active storage. >>> >>> VirtualDomain resource migrates properly during failover (node standby), >>>

Re: [ClusterLabs] Early VM resource migration

2015-12-16 Thread Klechomir
On 16.12.2015 17:52, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 12/16/2015 02:09 AM, Klechomir wrote: Hi list, I have a cluster with VM resources on a cloned active-active storage. VirtualDomain resource migrates properly during failover (node standby), but tries to migrate back too early, during failback, ignoring

Re: [ClusterLabs] Early VM resource migration

2015-12-16 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 12/16/2015 02:09 AM, Klechomir wrote: > Hi list, > I have a cluster with VM resources on a cloned active-active storage. > > VirtualDomain resource migrates properly during failover (node standby), > but tries to migrate back too early, during failback, ignoring the > "order" constraint, tellin

[ClusterLabs] Early VM resource migration

2015-12-16 Thread Klechomir
Hi list, I have a cluster with VM resources on a cloned active-active storage. VirtualDomain resource migrates properly during failover (node standby), but tries to migrate back too early, during failback, ignoring the "order" constraint, telling it to start when the cloned storage is up. This