On 14/01/20 21:16 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 14.01.2020 17:47, Jan Pokorný пишет:
>> What confused me is that 00:zz:yy:xx:5a:27 appears as if the same
>> address shall be used -- but in your explanation, it would definitely
>> be that case, correct?
>
> I expect MAC addresses be different (
14.01.2020 17:47, Jan Pokorný пишет:
> On 11/01/20 19:47 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 04.01.2020 01:42, Valentin Vidić пишет:
>>> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 09:52:09PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
What you've used appears to be akin to what this chunk of manpage
suggests (amongst others):
On 11/01/20 19:47 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 04.01.2020 01:42, Valentin Vidić пишет:
>> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 09:52:09PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>>> What you've used appears to be akin to what this chunk of manpage
>>> suggests (amongst others):
>>> https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/tree
04.01.2020 01:42, Valentin Vidić пишет:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 09:52:09PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> What you've used appears to be akin to what this chunk of manpage
>> suggests (amongst others):
>> https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/tree/extensions/libxt_cluster.man
>>
>> which is (yet anoth
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 09:52:09PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> What you've used appears to be akin to what this chunk of manpage
> suggests (amongst others):
> https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/tree/extensions/libxt_cluster.man
>
> which is (yet another) indicator to me that xt_cluster extension
On 27/12/19 15:04 +0100, Valentin Vidić wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 02:44:49PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> For the record, based on my feedback, iptables-extensions man page is
>> headed to (finally) align with the actual in-kernel deprecation
>> message:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-