On 20/05/16 17:04 +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Klaus Wenninger wrote:
>> On 05/20/2016 08:39 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> I think RAs should not rely on "stop" being called multiple times
>>> for a resource to be stopped.
>
> Well, this would be a major architectural change. Currently if
> stop fa
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 05:41 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > Earlier in this thread I proposed
> > the idea of a tiny temporary file in /run which tracks the last known
On 06/24/2016 05:41 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
> Well, if you're OK with bending the rules like this then that's good
> enough for me to say we should at least try it :)
I st
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> >> > Well, if you're OK with bending the rules like this then that's good
> >> > enough for me to say we should at least try it :)
> >>
> >> I still say you shouldn't only do it on error.
>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> > Well, if you're OK with bending the rules like this then that's good
>> > enough for me to say we should at least try it :)
>>
>> I still say you shouldn't only do it on error.
>
> When else should it be done?
I wa
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Adam Spiers wrote:
>> As per the FIXME, one remaining problem is dealing with this kind of
>> scenario:
>>
>> - Cloud operator notices SMART warnings on the compute node
>> which is not yet causing hard failures but signifies that the
>>
Adam Spiers wrote:
> As per the FIXME, one remaining problem is dealing with this kind of
> scenario:
>
> - Cloud operator notices SMART warnings on the compute node
> which is not yet causing hard failures but signifies that the
> hard disk might die soon.
>
> - Operator manually ru
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> >> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> >> >> O
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> >> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Adam
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> >> > We would also need to ensure that se
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> >> > Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> >> >> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> > Ken Gaillot wrote:
> >> >> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> >> > Maybe your point was that if the expected start n
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> > Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> >> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> >> > Adam Spiers wrote:
>> >> >> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Ken Gaillot wrote:
> >> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> > Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> >> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> Ken Gaillot wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>>> > Adam Spiers wrote:
>>> >> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> >>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>>
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> > Adam Spiers wrote:
>> >> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> > My main question is how usef
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > My main question is how useful would it actually be in the proposed use
> > cases. Co
07.06.2016 02:20, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/06/2016 03:30 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
06.06.2016 22:43, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/06/2016 12:25 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
06.06.2016 19:39, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ke
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Adam Spiers wrote:
>>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> My main question is how useful would it actually be in the pro
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> > > Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> > >> My main question is how useful would it actually be in the proposed use
>> > >> cases. Considering the poss
On 06/06/2016 03:30 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 06.06.2016 22:43, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 06/06/2016 12:25 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>> 06.06.2016 19:39, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot
> wrote:
On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> My main question is how useful would it actually be in the proposed use
> cases. Considering the possibility that the
Adam Spiers wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > >> My main question is how useful would it actually be in the proposed use
> > >> cases. Considering the possibility that the expected start might never
> > >> happen (
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Ken Gaillot wrote:
> >> On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> >> >> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
> >> >> var
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> >> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
>> >> variable that would be passed to resou
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> >> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
> >> variable that would be passed to resource agents, indicating whether a
> >> stop action was part
06.06.2016 22:43, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/06/2016 12:25 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
06.06.2016 19:39, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot
wrote:
On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at
On 06/06/2016 12:25 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 06.06.2016 19:39, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot
>>> wrote:
On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillo
06.06.2016 19:39, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new en
On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
variable that
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>>> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
>>> variable that would be passed to resource agents, indicating wheth
On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
>> variable that would be passed to resource agents, indicating whether a
>> stop action was part of a recovery.
>>
>> Since th
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
> variable that would be passed to resource agents, indicating whether a
> stop action was part of a recovery.
>
> Since that thread was long and covered a lot of topics, I'm s
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
> variable that would be passed to resource agents, indicating whether a
> stop action was part of a recovery.
>
> Since that thread was long and covered a lot of topics, I'm starting a
> new one to focus on
Le Thu, 19 May 2016 13:15:20 -0500,
Ken Gaillot a écrit :
> On 05/19/2016 11:43 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>> Le Thu, 19 May 2016 10:53:31 -0500,
>> Ken Gaillot a écrit :
>>
>>> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
>>> variable that would be passed to
On 05/19/2016 11:43 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> Le Thu, 19 May 2016 10:53:31 -0500,
> Ken Gaillot a écrit :
>
>> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
>> variable that would be passed to resource agents, indicating whether a
>> stop action was part of a
Le Thu, 19 May 2016 10:53:31 -0500,
Ken Gaillot a écrit :
> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
> variable that would be passed to resource agents, indicating whether a
> stop action was part of a recovery.
>
> Since that thread was long and covered a lot of topic
37 matches
Mail list logo
