Hi,
On 15 October 2015 at 16:45:58, Jan Pokorný (jpoko...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 15/10/15 12:25 +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > I inserted some debugging into fencing.py and found that stonithd
> > sends stuff like this to STDIN of the fencing agents it forks:
> >
> > action=list
> > param1=value1
Hi
I am running a 2 node cluster with this config on centos 6.5/6.6 where i
have a multi-state resource foo being run in master/slave mode and a bunch
of floating IP addresses configured. Additionally i have a collocation
constraint
for the IP addr to be collocated with the master.
Please find
Hi,
Pacemaker Explained discusses in 13.3 the special treatment of STONITH
resources. Now, I configured 6 fence_ipmilan instances in a cluster
which runs on 4 nodes currently. No STONITH resource started on the
node it can kill, even though I haven't configured location constraints
yet. Is this
On 19/10/15 06:53 AM, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am running a 2 node cluster with this config on centos 6.5/6.6 where
It's important to keep both nodes on the same minor version,
particularly in this case. Please either upgrade centos 6.5 to 6.6 or
both to 6.7.
> i have a multi-state resour
Hi Digimer
Please find my response inilne.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 19/10/15 06:53 AM, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am running a 2 node cluster with this config on centos 6.5/6.6 where
>
> It's important to keep both nodes on the same minor version,
> part
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:25:29PM +0200, users-requ...@clusterlabs.org wrote:
> From: Russell Martin
> Subject: [ClusterLabs] Corosync & pacemaker quit between boot and login
>
> ...
> Both corosync and pacemaker seem to start fine during boot (they both say
> "[OK]")
> However, once logged in,
Pacemaker supports fencing "topologies", allowing multiple fencing
devices to be used (in conjunction or as fallbacks) when a node needs to
be fenced.
However, there is a catch when using something like redundant power
supplies. If you put two power switches in the same topology level, and
Pacemak
On 19/10/15 12:34 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> Pacemaker supports fencing "topologies", allowing multiple fencing
> devices to be used (in conjunction or as fallbacks) when a node needs to
> be fenced.
>
> However, there is a catch when using something like redundant power
> supplies. If you put two p
Hi,
The http://www.ultrabug.fr/tuning-pacemaker-for-large-clusters/ blog
post states that "Pacemaker v1.1.11 should come with a feature which
will allow the IPC layer to adjust the PCMK_ipc_buffer automagically".
However, I failed to identify this in the ChangeLog. Did it really
happen, can I dro
On 10/19/2015 11:42 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 19/10/15 12:34 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> Pacemaker supports fencing "topologies", allowing multiple fencing
>> devices to be used (in conjunction or as fallbacks) when a node needs to
>> be fenced.
>>
>> However, there is a catch when using something like
10 matches
Mail list logo