Re: Regarding the SSHD 1.5.0 Release ETA

2017-05-20 Thread Oleg Nenashev
Anyway, thanks for you effort! Please let me know if I can help somehow. 2017-05-19 11:36 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet : > Unfortunately, it can't be published. There's a licensing issue that needs > to get sorted and we'll have to recut a release. > > 2017-05-19 11:06 GMT+02:00

Re: Regarding the SSHD 1.5.0 Release ETA

2017-05-19 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Unfortunately, it can't be published. There's a licensing issue that needs to get sorted and we'll have to recut a release. 2017-05-19 11:06 GMT+02:00 Oleg Nenashev : > Hi all, > > Thanks a lot for the release cut off, I see it in GitHub. Unfortunately > SSHD 1.5.0 has

Re: Regarding the SSHD 1.5.0 Release ETA

2017-05-19 Thread John Hartnup
I've never understood the relationship between the Maven Central releases and the official releases. Are they part of the dev team's activities, or does a third party do this? On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:07 AM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks a lot for the

Re: Regarding the SSHD 1.5.0 Release ETA

2017-05-19 Thread Oleg Nenashev
Hi all, Thanks a lot for the release cut off, I see it in GitHub. Unfortunately SSHD 1.5.0 has not been published in Maven Central yet: http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/sshd/sshd-core/ . Likely it is just waiting for the approval in staging. Would it be possible to get it published?

Re: Regarding the SSHD 1.5.0 Release ETA

2017-05-11 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 11/05/2017 à 09:45, Oleg Nenashev a écrit : > Hello, > > Thanks for the response! Looking forward to get a decision. > > I would probably wait till the Jigsaw mess gets resolved somehow ;) You mean, 2027 ? -- Emmanuel Lecharny Symas.com directory.apache.org

Re: Regarding the SSHD 1.5.0 Release ETA

2017-05-11 Thread Oleg Nenashev
Hello, Thanks for the response! Looking forward to get a decision. I would probably wait till the Jigsaw mess gets resolved somehow ;) The behavior of Jenkins core is known to be not ideal, but we cannot easily change it due to the compatibility requirements. Though better isolation is on the