Re: Active MQ 5.1 support

2008-09-16 Thread rde8026
like we might have to figure out some clever way to support both. > > -David > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19519440.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ 5.1 support

2008-09-16 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 16, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: Hi David, From my point of view, it's not possible to switch from 4.1.x to 5.1.x without any change in OpenEJB. In the current openejb-core module, the OpenEjbBrokerFactory implements BrokerFactory.BrokerFactoryHandler but in the Activ

Re: Active MQ 5.1 support

2008-09-16 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/activemq/activeio-core/3.1.0/activeio-core-3.1.0.jar >> >> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/camel/camel-core/1.3.0/camel-core-1.3.0.jar >> >> The activeio-core pom lists backport-util-concurrent as a dependency, >> but I couldn't find any use of it in their source. I'd try getting by >> without it. >> >> Definitely let us know how it goes. >> >> -David >> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19513877.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ 5.1 support

2008-09-16 Thread rde8026
it in their source. I'd try getting by > without it. > > Definitely let us know how it goes. > > -David > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19512712.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ 5.1 support

2008-09-16 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> > The activeio-core pom lists backport-util-concurrent as a dependency, > but I couldn't find any use of it in their source. I'd try getting by > without it. > > Definitely let us know how it goes. > > -David > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19512302.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ 5.1 support

2008-09-15 Thread rde8026
ache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/camel/camel-core/1.3.0/camel-core-1.3.0.jar > > The activeio-core pom lists backport-util-concurrent as a dependency, > but I couldn't find any use of it in their source. I'd try getting by > without it. > > Definitel

Re: Active MQ 5.1 support

2008-09-15 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 15, 2008, at 3:45 PM, rde8026 wrote: I'm using the standard lib form a zip file... Ok. In terms of general library upgrading, we generate two files (dependencies.xml and dependencies.txt) that we put inside of every openejb-*.jar that says what dependencies the jar has. The data

Re: Active MQ 5.1 support

2008-09-15 Thread rde8026
ssible, though I'm not sure if anyone has tried. > >> If so what does it take to make this change. > > Are you in maven or are you using the lib directory of a standalone > zip/tar? > > -David > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A

Re: Active MQ 5.1 support

2008-09-15 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 9, 2008, at 1:25 PM, rde8026 wrote: Is it possible to use active mq 5.1 with the openejb container rather than 4.1? It should be possible, though I'm not sure if anyone has tried. If so what does it take to make this change. Are you in maven or are you using the lib directory o

Active MQ 5.1 support

2008-09-09 Thread rde8026
Is it possible to use active mq 5.1 with the open ejb container rather than 4.1? If so what does it take to make this change. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19400471.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list