> On Jul 22, 2020, at 23:56, Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
>
> On 22 Jul 2020, at 23:14, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
>> However, I have questions of adoption rate, impersonation concerns,
>> anticompetitive concerns, and privacy concerns. This just sounds like a
>> commercial tracking pixel but the
Hi!
Loads of phishing is done that way.
Having a shtml with a post command to whatever they want from you… usually
banking/dhl …
With kind regards,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn
> Op 12 mrt 2024 om 20:37 heeft Jared Hall via users
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Is there a use case for emailing
On 3/12/2024 4:04 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Jared Hall via users skrev den 2024-03-12 20:37:
Is there a use case for emailing .shtml files, or can these just be
simply discarded?
i have seen .html attachment
only reason i think its tryed was to skip url testing in spamassassin
might be same
Jared Hall via users skrev den 2024-03-12 20:37:
Is there a use case for emailing .shtml files, or can these just be
simply discarded?
i have seen .html attachment
only reason i think its tryed was to skip url testing in spamassassin
might be same for shtml
i still have the clamav rule to
Is there a use case for emailing .shtml files, or can these just be
simply discarded?
Thanks,
-- Jared Hall
TRANS OCEAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT is the owner of yamibuy and I'm pretty sure if
you were to pick up the phone and call yamibuy's main office 1-800 407 9710 and
get transferred to their IT group you would be able to get someone who cared
enough to investigate.
Ted
I've not been able to report Abuse to Charter for several months now. When I
do, I get this clever response saying:
Spectrum>
This email address is for reporting incidents of abuse coming from IP addresses
registered to Charter Communications. Abuse from IP addresses not registered to
It appears that Kirk Ismay said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I've got a lot of finance / political spam that is passing through all
>filters because it's DKIM signed and using an email provider
>(salesforce.com & others). One thing they do include is a
>X-CSA-Complaints: csa-complai...@eco.de header,
I've got a lot of finance / political spam that is passing through all
filters because it's DKIM signed and using an email provider
(salesforce.com & others). One thing they do include is a
X-CSA-Complaints: csa-complai...@eco.de header, which looks legit.
Has anyone had success with
I see this in live mail, sent by RFC clueless administrators, causing business
mail to be either rejected or quarantined.
On production systems, the good mail server should self-discipline and fail
hard, compelling the system administrator to take action.
Original Message
On
On 2024-02-24 00:26, Matija Nalis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:43:53PM -0500, J Doe wrote:
23-Feb-2024 18:33:02.422 queries: info: (localhost.ca): query:
localhost.ca IN +E(0) (127.0.0.1)
23-Feb-2024 18:33:02.422 queries: info: (localhost): query: localhost IN
+E(0)
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:43:53PM -0500, J Doe wrote:
> 23-Feb-2024 18:33:02.422 queries: info: (localhost.ca): query:
> localhost.ca IN +E(0) (127.0.0.1)
>
> 23-Feb-2024 18:33:02.422 queries: info: (localhost): query: localhost IN
> +E(0) (127.0.0.1)
> What's interesting is that this
Hello,
I am running SA 4.0.0 on a low volume mail server.
When SA begins evaluating a message to determine whether or not it's
spam, I see the following DNS queries on my caching resolver:
23-Feb-2024 18:33:02.364 queries: info: (localhost.ca): query:
localhost.ca IN +E(0) (127.0.0.1)
Hi everybody...
To my knowledge when SA renders the html part of the email, it just remove HTML
tags and present results.
Ok so far.
But what if there is invisible text inside HTML tags due to its css style?
example to hide the word HOLA
Hkkdelavaca OkkdelavacaLkkdelavaca A
so rendered text is:
Hello to all users, contributors and Committers!
The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) are pleased to announce that
travel assistance applications for Community over Code Asia 2024 are now
open!
We will be supporting Community over Code Asia, Hangzhou, China
July 26th - 28th, 2024.
TAC exists
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 02:38:03PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2024-02-18 at 18:40:45 UTC-0500 (Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:40:45 +0100)
> Matija Nalis is rumored to have said:
> > - Firsty: yes, I'm fully aware of all issues associated with
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Callout_verification
>
>
On 2024-02-18 at 18:40:45 UTC-0500 (Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:40:45 +0100)
Matija Nalis
is rumored to have said:
Preface:
- Firsty: yes, I'm fully aware of all issues associated with
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Callout_verification
(and there is a LOT of them!)
Which is why SA does not
On 2024-02-19 at 07:37:03 UTC-0500 (Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:37:03 +
(UTC))
Pedro David Marco via users
is rumored to have said:
Hi everybody...
Does anyone know of a plugin for content modification?
Such a thing is not possible in SA, because SA has no mechanism for
arbitrary content
On 19.02.24 15:03, Dejan Doder wrote:
Please unsubscribe me from list
We can't, the process is user-driven.
send mail to users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org
and confirm in the confirmation mail that will be sent to tou.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;
Please unsubscribe me from list
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 2:51 PM wrote:
> >>If you do, it's anyway disabled on --lint.
> >
> > It does not matter what happens when you use --lint, because it skips
> > network checks, including DCC.
>
> Yes, that's what I said. It's disabled on --lint.
>
>
>>If you do, it's anyway disabled on --lint.
>
> It does not matter what happens when you use --lint, because it skips
> network checks, including DCC.
Yes, that's what I said. It's disabled on --lint.
>>spamassassin --prefs-file=/etc/spamassassin/local.cf -D 2> tmp.out <
>>~/test.eml
>
> I
and these indicate DCC is available.
I have "loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC" in
/etc/spamassassin/v310.pre
- try uncommenting it there.
On 19.02.24 08:17, glad.tent3...@fastmail.com wrote:
If you do, it's anyway disabled on --lint.
It does not matter what happens when you use
> and these indicate DCC is available.
>
> I have "loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC" in
> /etc/spamassassin/v310.pre
>
> - try uncommenting it there.
If you do, it's anyway disabled on --lint.
grep "loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC" `grep -rlni "loadplugin
On 19.02.24 12:47, Pedro David Marco via users wrote:
Yea Mattus, thanks i know it very well just wondering whether someone
tried it before or not via plugins...
not with spamassassin.
Perhaps filters like amavis, mimedefang, milter-regex or similar support
this.
On Monday,
Yea Mattus, thanks i know it very well just wondering whether someone
tried it before or not via plugins...
Thanks again!
Pedro.
On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 01:42:46 PM GMT+1, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
On 19.02.24 12:37, Pedro David Marco via users wrote:
>Does anyone
On 19.02.24 12:37, Pedro David Marco via users wrote:
Does anyone know of a plugin for content modification?
SpamAssassin detects spam, it is not designed to tho content modification.
an example, i want to change the word 'sex' for '---'
Anyway, this is a bad idea, for example you can
Hi everybody...
Does anyone know of a plugin for content modification? an example, i want to
change the word 'sex' for '---'
Thanks in adavance,
Pedro.
On 18.02.24 14:21, glad.tent3...@fastmail.com wrote:
I'm hoping someone can help troubleshooting using DCC in SpamAssassin.
My setup isn't populating the "X-Spam-DCC: : " header.
I configured SpamAssassin to use DCC
cat local.cf
...
loadplugin
Preface:
- Firsty: yes, I'm fully aware of all issues associated with
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Callout_verification
(and there is a LOT of them!)
- I'm not looking for debate about general usefulness of Callout
verification (and the system for which it is being investigated is
not
> Try this command for some real mail.eml
>
>spamassassin --prefs-file=/etc/spamassassin/local.cf -D dcc
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on
mail.MYDOMAIN.COM
X-Spam-Scanned: spamd.mail.MYDOMAIN.COM
X-Spam-Status: No,
Try this command for some real mail.eml
spamassassin --prefs-file=/etc/spamassassin/local.cf -D dcc Feb 18 21:10:36.754 [801727] warn: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.0/8 as
it has already been included
Feb 18 21:10:36.758 [801727] warn: netset: cannot include 172.16.0.0/12
as it has
Hello,
> try to increase dcc_timeout.
>
> # this works for me
> use_dcc 1
> dcc_home /var/dcc
> dcc_path /usr/local/bin/dccproc
> dcc_timeout 16
> add_header all DCC _DCCB_:_DCCR_
I tried values of 16, 30 & 100.
Same as before unfortunately.
No errors that I can see. Just no headers
Hello,
try to increase dcc_timeout.
# this works for me
use_dcc 1
dcc_home /var/dcc
dcc_path /usr/local/bin/dccproc
dcc_timeout 16
add_header all DCC _DCCB_:_DCCR_
Martin
Hello,
I'm hoping someone can help troubleshooting using DCC in SpamAssassin.
My setup isn't populating the
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024, at 2:47 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2024-02-18 at 14:21:41 UTC-0500 (Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:21:41 -0500)
>
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> Feb 18 11:18:06.796 [6905] dbg: dcc: local tests only,
>> disabling DCC
>
> That seems like a clear explanation: your
On 2024-02-18 at 14:21:41 UTC-0500 (Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:21:41 -0500)
is rumored to have said:
Feb 18 11:18:06.796 [6905] dbg: dcc: local tests only,
disabling DCC
That seems like a clear explanation: your configuration has disabled
'net' tests. You seem to have
Hello,
I'm hoping someone can help troubleshooting using DCC in SpamAssassin.
My setup isn't populating the "X-Spam-DCC: : " header.
I installed SpamAssassin 4.0.0
spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 4.0.0
running on Perl version 5.38.2
I run Postfix
You are seing it yourself. Their e-mails fail SPF allignment, SPF
authentication and DKIM authentication. As a consequence, they fail
DMARC.
The reports I receive pass DMARC with header.from=dmarc.yahoo.com.
cyber spaking -> cyber spanking
---
The Grammar Nazi in me
Original Message
On Feb 16, 2024, 12:12, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> You are seing it yourself. Their e-mails fail SPF allignment, SPF
> authentication and DKIM authentication. As a consequence, they fail DMARC.
>
> I
You are seing it yourself. Their e-mails fail SPF allignment, SPF
authentication and DKIM authentication. As a consequence, they fail DMARC.
I see a deluge of DMARC failures, mostly from forwarding accounts, mailing
lists, and the mass mailer musvc.com
I do not have the resources to contact
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 09:59 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > > On Feb 14, 2024, at 06:12, Ken Wright
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin.
> > > > As noted above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so
> > > > I started
> On Feb 14, 2024, at 06:12, Ken Wright
> wrote:
>
> I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin. As
> noted above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so I
> started with
>
> sudo apt install spamassassin spamc
>
> but I can't start the spamassassin.service; the
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 06:15 +0100, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>
> > On Feb 14, 2024, at 06:12, Ken Wright
> > wrote:
> >
> > I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin. As
> > noted above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so I
> > started with
> >
> > sudo apt
On Feb 14, 2024, at 06:12, Ken Wright wrote:
I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin. As noted
above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so I started with
sudo apt install spamassassin spamc
but I can't start the spamassassin.service; the error message I get
> On Feb 14, 2024, at 06:12, Ken Wright wrote:
>
> I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin. As noted
> above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so I started with
>
> sudo apt install spamassassin spamc
>
> but I can't start the spamassassin.service; the
I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin. As noted
above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so I started with
sudo apt install spamassassin spamc
but I can't start the spamassassin.service; the error message I get
when I run
sudo systemctl start
On 1/26/24 12:15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 26.01.24 11:03, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
Subject: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2
Rule broken. Please update.
can you provide more info, perhaps headers?
header FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 eval:check_for_no_hotmail_received_headers()
I´ve found a
Hi!
I recently checked the performance of the DecodeShortURI Plugin an noticed
some oddities:
*) snip.ly seems to need url_shortener_get
*) fb.me always responds with 200 even with GET and User-Agent set
*) t.co seems to respond with 200 if User-Agent is a "valid" Browser, but
with 30x
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:01 PM Kevin A. McGrail mailto:kmcgr...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi Alex, we are definitely seeing them. There is code in trunk for this
with one of the plugins and rules in the KAM ruleset using the new
code. LMK if you need more info.
On 2/4/24 18:56, Alex
On 2/5/24 09:49, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:01 PM Kevin A. McGrail mailto:kmcgr...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi Alex, we are definitely seeing them. There is code in trunk for this
with one of the plugins and rules in the KAM ruleset using the new
code. LMK if
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:01 PM Kevin A. McGrail mailto:kmcgr...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi Alex, we are definitely seeing them. There is code in trunk for this
with one of the plugins and rules in the KAM ruleset using the new
code. LMK if you need more info.
On 2/4/24 18:56, Alex
On 2/4/24 18:56, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:01 PM Kevin A. McGrail mailto:kmcgr...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi Alex, we are definitely seeing them. There is code in trunk for this
with one of the plugins and rules in the KAM ruleset using the new
code. LMK if you need
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:01 PM Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Hi Alex, we are definitely seeing them. There is code in trunk for this
> with one of the plugins and rules in the KAM ruleset using the new
> code. LMK if you need more info.
>
It looks like it's tied to the Raptor service and the
Hello to all users, contributors and Committers!
The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) are pleased to announce that
travel assistance applications for Community over Code EU 2024 are now
open!
We will be supporting Community over Code EU, Bratislava, Slovakia,
June 3th - 5th, 2024.
TAC exists
Hello to all users, contributors and Committers!
The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) are pleased to announce that
travel assistance applications for Community over Code EU 2024 are now
open!
We will be supporting Community over Code EU, Bratislava, Slovakia,
June 3th - 5th, 2024.
TAC exists
Hi Alex, we are definitely seeing them. There is code in trunk for this
with one of the plugins and rules in the KAM ruleset using the new
code. LMK if you need more info.
On 2/1/2024 4:06 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm just wondering if there is any mechanism for detecting and
blocking QR code
Hi,
I'm just wondering if there is any mechanism for detecting and blocking QR
code emails? Would that require using image detection? Perhaps instead it's
a database of known malicious QR codes?
Has anyone even really seen any?
SA 3.4.6.
Is there any way to create a rule that hits emails with duplicate
filename attachments?
MAIN HEADER DECLARATION:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-6aIz+S039AYG/4raFdExeg=="
BODY PART MIME HEADERS:
--=-6aIz+S039AYG/4raFdExeg==
Content-Type:
On 2024-01-31 at 08:16:13 UTC-0500 (Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:16:13 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
On 2024-01-30 at 12:08:18 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:08:18 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
[...]
autolearn may help if your DB is well maintained,
On 2024-01-30 at 12:08:18 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:08:18 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
[...]
autolearn may help if your DB is well maintained, although I have
disabled nearly all rules with negative scores, like
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_*
RCVD_IN_IADB_* DKIMWL_WL_*
On 2024-01-30 at 12:08:18 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:08:18 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
[...]
autolearn may help if your DB is well maintained, although I have
disabled nearly all rules with negative scores, like
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_*
RCVD_IN_IADB_* DKIMWL_WL_*
On 30.01.24 09:59, joe a wrote:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back
to 2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too old". For saved SPAM?
On 1/30/2024 10:58:52, Matus
On 1/30/2024 10:58:52, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.01.24 09:59, joe a wrote:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back to
2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too
On 2024-01-30 at 09:59:52 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:59:52 -0500)
joe a
is rumored to have said:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
Yes. That is why it has an expiration model. Expiration may be de facto
blocked on some busy systems so you may need to explicitly force it
On 30.01.24 09:59, joe a wrote:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back to
2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too old". For saved SPAM?
I did retrain on old spam a
On 2024-01-29 at 23:06:07 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:06:07 +1000)
Nick Edwards
is rumored to have said:
omfg
even killing it, then having to kill every individual sub process
manually...
re run using -f
and it still loops and times out.
very braindead install process. looks like there
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back to
2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too old". For saved SPAM?
On 30.01.24 13:36, Nick Edwards wrote:
Set up a new server today, took no time in postfix dovecot and amavisd,
apache roundcube, and everything, then came spamassassin
thankfully I chose to install this whilst we left for lunch, but 45mins
later to my horror it was still trying to install,
omfg
even killing it, then having to kill every individual sub process
manually...
re run using -f
and it still loops and times out.
very braindead install process. looks like there is no way for
spamassassin to install, I never recall having this problem ever before on
all 3.x versions, but
Venting
Set up a new server today, took no time in postfix dovecot and amavisd,
apache roundcube, and everything, then came spamassassin
thankfully I chose to install this whilst we left for lunch, but 45mins
later to my horror it was still trying to install, why? because its tests
failed for
So there is no solution to this?
Is it possible to add the IP as an argument to a rule's Describe, using
something like $1 for the detected regex value? If so, how would this be
implemented?
An actual exemple is FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT which has a description
such as
On 26.01.24 11:03, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
Subject: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2
Rule broken. Please update.
can you provide more info, perhaps headers?
header FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 eval:check_for_no_hotmail_received_headers()
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;
Rule broken. Please update.
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 15:15 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-19 11:12:
>
> > I rely on DNSWL for the reputable MX.
>
> if repution is 100% needed we all have to make local rescore on all
> local mails, since repution is to be local, not external just
>
> i
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024, Thomas Cameron wrote:
On 1/19/24 16:32, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
There is a filtering rule in Gmail:
*Never send it to Spam*
I apply that rule to extremely important emails such as debian-bugs-
dist and debian-devel-announce.
You know that. I know that. But trying to
On 1/19/24 16:32, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
There is a filtering rule in Gmail:
*Never send it to Spam*
I apply that rule to extremely important emails such as debian-bugs-
dist and debian-devel-announce.
You know that. I know that. But trying to explain to the board members
I'm helping out
Hellow Thomas,
> But it drops it into the spam folder every time. So when I'm sending
> emails to someone's alias, they have to check their spam folder. Even
> when they mark it as "not spam," GMail still drops it into the spam
> folder. It's very frustrating.
>
There is a filtering rule in
On 1/19/24 14:33, Matija Nalis wrote:
You would need to encourage at least several of the recepients (the
more the better) to click on "Not spam" button on GMail on such
mails. Then it will (eventually) start accepting them normally.
Yup, that's basically what I've been doing.
see e.g.
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 10:37:13AM -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> The forwarded email is being *accepted* by GMail. My issue now is that GMail
> drops it into the recipient's spam folder. I suspect it's a reputation
> thing. Once the server is up and running for a while, I'm hoping that GMail
>
On 1/7/24 05:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email
comes into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would
normally just create an alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to
president@ get forwarded to the president's "real"
On 1/7/24 04:07, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Hellow Thomas,
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043539#88
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
The issue is not so much that GMail doesn't accept the email. It does,
since I have DKIM, DMARC, and SPF set up.
But it drops it into the spam
Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-19 11:12:
I rely on DNSWL for the reputable MX.
if repution is 100% needed we all have to make local rescore on all
local mails, since repution is to be local, not external just
i consider dnswl level 0 to be possitive scored, and let the other
levels be
Marc skrev den 2024-01-19 09:34:
Hi Byung and Benny, are you having a nice MX party? :)
not needed yet, hehe
Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-19 06:16:
Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Recently, i created dedicated
MXs and am continuing to operate them. Plus, the dedicated MXs run on
Google Cloud and RimuHosting.
it was to vierd for me to figure out how to get it working, and posible
in the
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:53 PM Greg Troxel wrote:
> H
> Tom Bartel writes:
>
> > Starting March 1, 2024, we will allow up to 10,000 requests per user
> over a
> > 30-day time period. After the 10,000 requests, users must create a
> > MyValidity account to continue using this free service. Upon
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 08:34 +, Marc wrote:
> > > Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
> > >
> > > > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
> > >
> > > +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
> > >
> >
> > Hellow Benny,
> >
> > Actually i used Google MX for 10 years.
> > Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
> >
> > > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
> >
> > +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
> >
>
> Hellow Benny,
>
> Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Recently, i created dedicated
> MXs and am continuing to operate them.
Tom,
Tom Bartel writes:
> Hello SA Community,
>
> Following is an update on the changes at Validity regarding public query
> access for reputation data in DNS. We're finalizing the implementation in SA
> to enable this. As with Spamhaus DQS, we'll use the response code
> 127.255.255.255 to
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 17:17 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
>
> > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
>
> +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
>
Hellow Benny,
Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Recently, i created dedicated
MXs
H
Tom Bartel writes:
> Starting March 1, 2024, we will allow up to 10,000 requests per user over a
> 30-day time period. After the 10,000 requests, users must create a
> MyValidity account to continue using this free service. Upon the creation
> of a MyValidity account, you will receive
Hello SA Community,
Following is an update on the changes at Validity regarding public query
access for reputation data in DNS. We're finalizing the implementation in
SA to enable this. As with Spamhaus DQS, we'll use the response code
127.255.255.255 to indicate excessive querying. Any
On 2024-01-16 at 18:33:23 UTC-0500 (Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:33:23 -0600)
Noel
is rumored to have said:
This - getting a .com domain to send mail - is really the only choice
you have.
I have not seen major problems with *.net or *.org domains getting
deliverability and some ccTLDs have
Thanks, Matus, but that does not work. I'm looking for something that
will show in the spam body or subject so I do not have to view the headers.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 05:06:11PM -0800, Cabel Sasser wrote:
> If you believe every new gTLD is garbage (and I get that!), why isn’t
> SpamAssassin automatically dinging, say, 1,200+ of them?
I have to second the advice to send email from a different domain.
It's just going to be the case
On 1/16/2024 4:49 PM, Cabel Sasser wrote:
HI Josh,
Thank you so much for your reply!
Most likely, SA specifically whitelisting legit domains in those poisonous TLDs
which are brought to our attention by, for instance, reports like yours. Less
likely but possible: seeing enough ham claiming
HI Josh,
Thank you so much for your reply!
> Most likely, SA specifically whitelisting legit domains in those poisonous
> TLDs which are brought to our attention by, for instance, reports like yours.
> Less likely but possible: seeing enough ham claiming to be from those TLDs in
> the
On 16.01.24 15:29, Linkcheck via users wrote:
When receiving a report in a spam the reported rules state reason and
score but it would be useful if, either on one of those rules or a
separate rule (or even in the Subject) there could be a report of the
final Received IP. Depending on the IP
When receiving a report in a spam the reported rules state reason and
score but it would be useful if, either on one of those rules or a
separate rule (or even in the Subject) there could be a report of the
final Received IP. Depending on the IP and its country of origin I
sometimes block the
* Michael Orlitzky:
> the result for me at least is that it's less work (i.e. less
> expensive) to just block every new gTLD and whitelist the few
> legitimate senders brave enough to live there.
My guess is that a significant number of mail service administrators use
the same approach. I
Hello Laurent,
I wanted to express my gratitude for sharing the tip on rawbody matching.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Jimmy
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:01 PM Laurent S. <
110ef9e3086d8405c2929e34be5b4...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> If you want to get that exact
301 - 400 of 105379 matches
Mail list logo