RE: sa-compile format the standard now?

2008-02-14 Thread Bowie Bailey
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > > > > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its > > > > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?

RE: sa-compile format the standard now?

2008-02-14 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > > > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its > > > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using > > > it. > > > > I do

RE: sa-compile format the standard now?

2008-02-14 Thread Robert - elists
> > I don't use it here because it takes too long (over 20 minutes) to > compile. > (This is with SA v3.2.4, which is a big improvement over v3.2.3) > > L Why would how long it takes to compile matter as long as you get some return on investment? Is the machine heavily loaded or just a small u

RE: sa-compile format the standard now?

2008-02-14 Thread Bowie Bailey
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its > > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using > > it. > > I don't use it here because it takes too long (over 20 minutes) to

RE: sa-compile format the standard now?

2008-02-14 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using it. I don't use it here because it takes too long (over 20 minutes) to compile. (This is with SA v3.2.4, which is a

RE: sa-compile format the standard now?

2008-02-13 Thread Bowie Bailey
Robert - elists wrote: > > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its > > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using > > it. > > > > That said, I still cannot get it to work on my system. Everything > > works fine with the standard rulesets, but as soo

RE: sa-compile format the standard now?

2008-02-13 Thread Robert - elists
> > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using it. > > That said, I still cannot get it to work on my system. Everything works > fine with the standard rulesets, but as soon as I enable the compiled > rules

RE: sa-compile format the standard now?

2008-02-13 Thread Bowie Bailey
Robert - elists wrote: > Greetings > > Is using sa-compile the standard now? > > ... or are most organizations still just using the stock formatted > rulesets? > > If not the standard, is it the SA recommended standard? > > I know there can be problems or issues, yet if we do use sa-compile as