>
> >>
> >> 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez >:
> >> > You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
> >> > From: Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >> > To: users@tomee.apache.org
> >> > Sent: Thursday, Decem
s.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez :
>> > You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
>> > From: Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> > To: users@tomee.apache.org
>> >
au
>
>
> 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez :
> > You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
> > From: Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > To: users@tomee.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
> > Subject: Re: Tom
-Louis Monteiro
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
> probably another one for source code.
>
> --
> Je
You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
pro
looking into some other errors, namely:
> >> >>
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
> >> >>
> >> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton
> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
>> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
>> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
>> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.j
; users@tomee.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> should be ok now
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
&g
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
To: Roberto Cortez ; "users@tomee.apache.org"
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitrib
From: Roberto Cortez
>> To: "users@tomee.apache.org"
>> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
>>
>>
>>
ct?
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Roberto Cortez
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org"
> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
>
>
> To:
plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
To: "users@tomee.apache.org"
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/ja
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
To: "users@tomee.apache.org"
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/o
about @Transactional can be linked to the test:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=blob;f=container/openejb-core/src/test/java/org/apache/openejb/cdi/transactional/TransactionScopeTest.java;h=d7f27c072ca1e4e99e418794b238dc7f3e0a871e;hb=ae8f512c5655dfd9024353c5a46340c6de07edf3
en
it can help a bit
https://github.com/jayway/JsonPath/tree/master/json-path-assert
El Thu Dec 04 2014 at 10:21:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
rmannibu...@gmail.com>) va escriure:
> hehe love this error:
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-
> samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$ja
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
but
was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" a écrit :
> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now
> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://t
There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p46
Thanks! I'll have a look.
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; Roberto Cortez
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
On CDI entry points are:
1) AnnotationDeployer#getBeanClasses
2) CdiScanner
Romain Mann
sday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these
> particular tests but hopefully it will
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannib
beans.xml,
> since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional.
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org"
> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Hi
> Will not be
the description it's optional.
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org"
> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Hi
> Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this o
description it's optional.
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
To: "users@tomee.apache.org"
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi
Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev
now
Le jeudi 6 novemb
, Roberto Cortez
> wrote:
>
>> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
>> To: Roberto Cortez
>> Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; David Blevins <
>> david.blev...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, Novem
; ; David Blevins <
> david.blev...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if y
Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
To: Roberto Cortez
Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; David Blevins
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
seems tomee embedded profile misses at least
__
>> From: Roberto Cortez
>> To: Romain Manni-Bucau ; "users@tomee.apache.org"
>>
>> Cc: David Blevins
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking to
gt; Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>
>
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
>
>
>
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; Roberto Cortez
>
> Cc: David
quot;users@tomee.apache.org"
Cc: David Blevins
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; Roberto Cortez
Cc: David B
Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; Roberto Cortez
Cc: David Blevins
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hello Roberto,
is it broken again?
it's unavailable. They are
> looking into it.
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: David Blevins
> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on t
nt: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi David,
Thanks for a warm welcome :)
The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the
Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are
looking into it.
Cheers,Rob
Hi David
Thanks for the useful info about IBM decision on switching form OpenJPA to
Eclipselink from JPA 2.1. I think that's exactly the point.
I myself also prefer OpenJPA, but I can understand why IBM wants to stick
with eclipselink from now on.
[]
Leo
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:13 AM, David B
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track
these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache si
Hi Romain,
Yes, Travis was also setup as a backup plan. Let's see what's going to happen
with Cloudbees.
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
To: "users@tomee.apache.org"
Cc: Roberto Cortez
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Ja
some issues with our CI
>> environment, but it will be there.
>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>> Cheers,Roberto
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>&
useful information and count me in to help :)
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" a écrit :
> >
&g
On Nov 2, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
> apache.
>
> Well stay openjpa i think.
>
> Btw this kind of discussion is generally usel
d including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
> environment, but it will be there.
> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:
cau
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" a écrit :
>
> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>
>
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" a écrit :
>
> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>
>
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>
> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>
> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will b
Hi
not sure why me but:
2014-09-25 11:22 GMT+02:00 tibor17 :
> Hi Romain,
> Can you estimate the RC1 for TomEE 2.0?
> As I understand 2.0 is for Java EE 7.
> Regarding the JPA 2.1 the OpenJPA is still not ready to provide it. Can you
> switch to Hibernate 5.x instead?
No we just need to do it ;
Hi Jesse,
Maybe you could contribute that to the project?
You just need to create a root JIRA for Java EE 7 and add some subtask to
it.
Would be great.
I can also create a page so that you can contribute a page on the website.
Up to you.
2013/6/3 jieryn
> Greetings,
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013
Greetings,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:36 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Exactly. We need all these projects to complete their portion of JavaEE 7:
> - CDI 1.1 - Apache OpenWebBeans
> - EJB 3.2 - Apache OpenEJB
> - JPA 2.1 - Apache OpenJPA
> - JSF 2.2 - Apache MyFaces
> - Servlet 3.1 - Apache Tomcat
Wow, nice response David. A nice list that show impact and new/target
versions and even mention of the time line.
On Jun 3, 2013 12:36 AM, "David Blevins" wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:04 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> > I think realistically you need all of the components to bump up to their
>
Will be probably hard to get a JMS 2.0 compliant release from ActiveMQ. It
may require additional work to switch to Apollo as it looks to be the
product to rely on.
JLouis
2013/6/3 David Blevins
>
> On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:04 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> > I think realistically you need all of t
Let me play of the bet game and say jaxrs will be the fastest ;). It is
almost already in the box and the easier to integrate (thks cxf).
All projects are not linked excepted tomcat and websockets where we have to
work at tomee level and not openejb. That s why i see it as the first step
in our ja
On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:04 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I think realistically you need all of the components to bump up to their
> Java EE 7 compliant versions.
Exactly. We need all these projects to complete their portion of JavaEE 7:
- CDI 1.1 - Apache OpenWebBeans
- EJB 3.2 - Apache OpenEJB
- J
Well, this particular one will almost be usable in javaee 6 out of the box
;)
Le 2 juin 2013 06:35, "Anthony Fryer" a écrit :
> Can't wait for JSR 352 Batch Applications for the Java Platform. Looks
> very
> much like "spring batch" which i have used and thought was one of the best
> spring modu
Can't wait for JSR 352 Batch Applications for the Java Platform. Looks very
much like "spring batch" which i have used and thought was one of the best
spring modules that had no equivalent in jee.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp
Understood, thanks Romain and John!
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Once tomcat is here we can branch, before dont even think of it
> Le 1 juin 2013 12:04, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
>
> > I think realistically you need all of the components to bump up to their
> > Ja
Once tomcat is here we can branch, before dont even think of it
Le 1 juin 2013 12:04, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> I think realistically you need all of the components to bump up to their
> Java EE 7 compliant versions.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >wrote:
>
> > Tomee
I think realistically you need all of the components to bump up to their
Java EE 7 compliant versions.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Tomee is tomcat so we need at least a tomcat 8 release
> Le 1 juin 2013 05:13, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." a
> écrit :
>
> > Of course, I
Tomee is tomcat so we need at least a tomcat 8 release
Le 1 juin 2013 05:13, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." a
écrit :
> Of course, I saw the following blog post:
>
> Introducing Java EE 7: June 12 Kickoff[1]
>
> I think I heard some chatter about Java EE 7 on this list sometime
> recently, but I don't re
54 matches
Mail list logo
