go for it if you want, its a 5 minute thing anyways. and yes, there
should be a setting that is off by default in both dev and prod modes.
-igor
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:04 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1830
>
> If you don't
Ah sorry, you must have beat me to it by seconds!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1831
I'll close mine off as a dupe... With regards to scheduling, it would be
really great to have this in 1.3.5 if it's not a big change.
Thanks,
Jan
2008/9/13 James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> D
Done:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1830
If you don't mind, I'd like to take a stab at this. I can submit a
patch. Do you want me to develop it against trunk or the 1.3 branch?
I assume you want this to be optional in development mode so that we
don't screw up all of the generate
That sounds very promising, thanks!
Jan
2008/9/12 Pointbreak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Also, have you
> > successfully tested Ajax applications using Selenium-RC and Junit?
>
> I have, and Selenium works really well for testing wicket ajax
> applications. Only thing I had to
open a jira issue and we can whip it up
-igor
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:54 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That might be pretty cool! I can see how that might help constructing
> your unit tests.
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> we ca
That might be pretty cool! I can see how that might help constructing
your unit tests.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we can always make it so there is a setting that outputs the full path
> as an attribute of a component if that is helpful.
>
> eg
>
>
we can always make it so there is a setting that outputs the full path
as an attribute of a component if that is helpful.
eg
-igor
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:18 PM, German Morales
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/12 Jan Stette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Hi German, thanks for an interesting re
2008/9/12 Jan Stette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi German, thanks for an interesting reply.
>
> Ruby probably wouldn't be appropriate in our environment, but it's still
> interesting to see the principles involved in writing tests using it. Some
> points I'm not clear about:
>
> When Wicket generates
> Also, have you
> successfully tested Ajax applications using Selenium-RC and Junit?
I have, and Selenium works really well for testing wicket ajax
applications. Only thing I had to do was to add a script to the pages
that helps selenium figure out when ajax requests are finished. See this
threa
Thanks Peter, those are interesting links. As for the question I asked of
German as well, are you able to get the full wicket path for components, or
just the local wicket:ids? If the latter, how do you deal with components
that can be instantiated multiple times on a page? Also, have you
succes
Hi German, thanks for an interesting reply.
Ruby probably wouldn't be appropriate in our environment, but it's still
interesting to see the principles involved in writing tests using it. Some
points I'm not clear about:
When Wicket generates pages, as far as I can tell, the wicket:id that's
stat
Actually there are more platforms for watir (
http://wtr.rubyforge.org/platforms.html): FireWatir and SafariWatir.
I gave a quick try to FireWatir some time ago, with no much success, but
they continue working on it.
They mention also "a Watir interface that uses Selenium".
2008/9/12 Peter Thom
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:12 PM, German Morales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> We are using Watir, which lets you write tests in ruby.
>
For those who don't want to use Ruby, Watij is the Java equivalent of
Watir. http://watij.com/
But the problem with both Watij and Watir is that you
Hi Jan,
We are using Watir, which lets you write tests in ruby.
And we are using mainly wicket generated names for identification of
components, but sometimes we use generated attributes too (for example
does not have name), or just the text in the html.
Since the code is all in ruby, it is in
This is a bit of a general question: I'd be interested in hearing about how
people do automated tests of their Wicket applications. I'm thinking about
system tests of the full application, not unit tests.
There are of course tools like Selenium which let you automate actions on a
web application.
15 matches
Mail list logo