Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/09/2008 15:06:05:
> For Wicket the doctype is not needed, so do what you like. Just remember
> to keep it in XML syntax.
Reading this I wonder if I just have to produce well-formed html files (
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-well-formed), or taki
For Wicket the doctype is not needed, so do what you like. Just remember
to keep it in XML syntax. There is only one ceavat: you should always
write instead of ,
Wicket ignores the XML definition that specifies that these should be
treated as semantically equivalent.
Regards,
Erik.
[EMAIL P
Hello,
As a Wicket beginner, I was wondering if there are any contra-indication
to generate some HTML 4.01 Strict instead of any XHTML 1.0 version
(transitionnal or strict) ?
I tried to simply add an HTML 4.01 strict doctype to my html files, and it
seems to work fine (thought in development mo
