We are using plotly for charts quite often (plotly python in conjunction with
pyspark) and it reavels a weakness regarding to third party JS library
integration.
Unfortunately current plotly integration is not very efficient in terms of
library integration, which leads to huge notebooks. This i
Sure, we are very happy to have someone help verify zeppelin on windows.
Divya Gehlot 于2018年8月14日周二 上午10:42写道:
> Hi Jeff,
> As most of the people still uses windows machine for local mode .
> Can I be help to test it on windows ?
>
> Thanks,
> Divya
>
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 13:04, Jeff Zhang
Thanks for the discussion.
>>> I'm afraid about non-latin symbols in folder and note name. And what
about hieroglyphs?
AFAIK, linux allow all the characters to be file name except `\0` and '/'.
I can create file name with Chinese character in linux, I guess you can use
Russian as well.
>>> If I un
Hi Jeff,
As most of the people still uses windows machine for local mode .
Can I be help to test it on windows ?
Thanks,
Divya
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 13:04, Jeff Zhang wrote:
>
> I believe this is before 0.8, we made lots of changes in 0.8, but
> unfortunately we don't have resources to test it
Thanks for bringing this up for discussion. My 2 cents below.
I am with Maksim and Felix on concerns with special characters now allowed
in notebook names, and also concerns with different charsets. Russian
language, for example, most commonly use iso-8859-5, koi-8r/u, windows-1251
charsets etc. T
The use of Russian and other specific letters in the note name is big advantage
of Zeppelin. I would not like to give up this functionality.
I support the idea about `zpln` file extension.
The folder structure also sounds good.
I'm afraid about non-latin symbols in folder and note name. And what
Ok, thanks Jeff – that all makes sense! Yes, rendering and diffing notebooks
in github would be very nice.
From: Jeff Zhang
Sent: 13 August 2018 10:50
To: users@zeppelin.apache.org
Subject: EXT: Re: [DISCUSS] ZEPPELIN-2619. Save note in [Title].zpln instead of
[NOTEID]/note.json
>>> Do we nee
>>> Do we need the note id in the file name at all? What’s wrong with just
note_name.zpln?
The reason I keep note id is because currently we use noteId to identify
one note. e.g. we use note id in both websocket api and rest api. It is
almost impossible to remove noteId for the current architecture
Hi Jeff,
I have some questions about this proposal (I can’t edit the design doc):
1. Do we need the note id in the file name at all? What’s wrong with just
note_name.zpln?
2. If the file content is json then why not use note_name.json instead of
.zpln? That would make it easier for edito
In that case, zeppelin should fail to create note.
Felix Cheung 于2018年8月13日周一 下午3:47写道:
> Perhaps one concern is users having characters in note name that are
> invalid for file name/file path?
>
>
> --
> *From:* Mohit Jaggi
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 12, 2018 6:02 PM
>
Perhaps one concern is users having characters in note name that are invalid
for file name/file path?
From: Mohit Jaggi
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 6:02 PM
To: users@zeppelin.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ZEPPELIN-2619. Save note in [Title].zpln in
11 matches
Mail list logo