Re: [vdr] Re: [linux-dvb] Kernel bug using kernel 2.6.17

2006-08-21 Thread Jose Alberto Reguero
El Lunes, 21 de Agosto de 2006 22:26, Darren Salt escribió: > I demand that Jose Alberto Reguero may or may not have written... > > > I have problems with kernels newer that 2.6.16 and vdr. > > With kernel 2.6.17.9 see atached log1. > > With kernel 2.6.18-rc4 with kernels drivers and with last merc

Re: [vdr] Re: [linux-dvb] Kernel bug using kernel 2.6.17

2006-08-21 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Jose Alberto Reguero may or may not have written... > I have problems with kernels newer that 2.6.16 and vdr. > With kernel 2.6.17.9 see atached log1. > With kernel 2.6.18-rc4 with kernels drivers and with last mercurial drivers > see log2. > After that errors I need to reboot. [snip

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-21 Thread Jörn Reder
Udo Richter wrote: > > It makes no sense that a CAM budget card is always used to > > record a free channel, which makes it impossible to view and/or record > > encrypted channels at the same time. A CAM is a valuable resource, > > wasting it is obviously a bad idea. > > What if the FF card is

[vdr] Re: [linux-dvb] Kernel bug using kernel 2.6.17

2006-08-21 Thread Jose Alberto Reguero
I have problems with kernels newer that 2.6.16 and vdr. With kernel 2.6.17.9 see atached log1. With kernel 2.6.18-rc4 with kernels drivers and with last mercurial drivers see log2. After that errors I need to reboot. Thanks. Jose Alberto El Lunes, 3 de Julio de 2006 18:44, Jose Alberto Reguero es

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-21 Thread Anssi Hannula
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > Udo Richter wrote: > >> Jörn Reder wrote: >> >>> Hmm, it's not that easy because it ignores the original intention of >>> this thread. >> >> >> Not really. The side effect that osdteletext will force recordings on >> the FF card on the same transponder was caused by the