Re: MO

2005-03-01 Thread Lex Eisenhardt
Why don't we all leave this list? Seriously, I really can do without this nonsense. I'm thinking of folding it completely. I guess you are not in the position to do that? It's our list. I don't want to be responsible for creating more space in the cyberworld where we can flex our

RE: MO

2005-02-28 Thread Rob MacKillop
Message- From: Stephan Olbertz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 February 2005 08:24 To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: MO Dear Rob, I didn't know that this list is moderated. While in the past there were quite some flamewars on other lists between MO and others (it takes at least two, BTW

Re: MO

2005-02-28 Thread Stephan Olbertz
To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: MO Dear Rob, I didn't know that this list is moderated. While in the past there were quite some flamewars on other lists between MO and others (it takes at least two, BTW), we all are capable of setting up appropriate filters in our software. I have been

RE: MO

2005-02-28 Thread Rob MacKillop
No problem! I think I was not very clear in my first post. I was a bit depressed about it all. Cheers, Rob -Original Message- From: Stephan Olbertz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 February 2005 19:05 To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu; Rob MacKillop Subject: Re: MO Dear Rob, I

Re: MO

2005-02-28 Thread Antonio Corona
Dear all, I donĀ“t know how such a situation may have arised, but one fact is perfectly clear to me: in a list devoted to communicate and share, either all of us - even those we disagree with - have a place, or there is no point in pursuing what may become a futile exercice. I have often read