Lalo Martins wrote: > Oooh, interesting thought. Would types and contextual names be allowed > to be unicode too?
Probably not, It would be nice I guess, but I don't think it's at all neccesary. Plus, then URLs would be potentially multibyte or otherwise in obscure encodings and that would cause problems for external apps. I dunno though, I like the idea of getting away from the English-centric nature of software and the net... Reed _______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list vos-d@interreality.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
