[wtr-general] Re: WatirRecorder being forked and resurrected.

2010-12-03 Thread watirboy
Hey Charley, Thanks for the heads up. I will monitor this thread closely and try to move the conversation over to a new group. I talked to Scott and he gave me his blessing, and since I got it out of the OpenQA SVN I figured it's gotta be under some OSI Compliant license. The Ruby version of the

Re: [wtr-general] Re: WatirRecorder being forked and resurrected.

2010-12-03 Thread Charley Baker
No worries. I'm curious to see how it goes. Like I say, there's potential for a scraper, recorders can lead into a large abyss between newbie and intermediate scripting, as well as countless other problems, notably the easy silver bullet for automation. It's a tricky path to navigate, but as I

[wtr-general] Re: WatirRecorder being forked and resurrected.

2010-12-03 Thread Dave McNulla
That's what I use recorders for - to scrape and to learn. They don't always scrape what I want (capture ID when I want name, text when I want ID, etc.). Sounds like a nice feature to be able to specify priority of properties. Good luck Enrique. Let me know if you would like some ideas or for a