Re: [web2py] Re: web2py added on PyPy compatibility page

2011-07-11 Thread Richard Vézina
;-) Richard On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:31 PM, cjrh wrote: > That is a complicated question: > > 1) Single page load: no. This is generally an IO-bound kind of system, > e.g. an infinitely fast processor would have almost no effect on response > time. > > 2) Concurrency/Scaling: generally, no. T

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py added on PyPy compatibility page

2011-07-07 Thread cjrh
That is a complicated question: 1) Single page load: no. This is generally an IO-bound kind of system, e.g. an infinitely fast processor would have almost no effect on response time. 2) Concurrency/Scaling: generally, no. This is dominated by the DB backend, and (generally) the speed at which

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py added on PyPy compatibility page

2011-07-07 Thread Richard Vézina
Does it speed up web2py? Richard On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:28 AM, danto wrote: > 2011/7/7 cjrh > >> On Jul 7, 1:27 pm, cjrh wrote: >> > On further examination, it looks like leaking file descriptors is enough >> to >> > mark a library as "incompatible" (this happened with mercurial), so I >>

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py added on PyPy compatibility page

2011-07-07 Thread danto
2011/7/7 cjrh > On Jul 7, 1:27 pm, cjrh wrote: > > On further examination, it looks like leaking file descriptors is enough > to > > mark a library as "incompatible" (this happened with mercurial), so I > have > > changed web2py's to "incompatible" until we can fix all the leaks. > > I should al