Re: [Webware-devel] What's needed for Webware 1.0? A braindeadinstaller

2002-04-09 Thread Terrel Shumway
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 23:42, Ian Bicking wrote: > On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 01:11, Terrel Shumway wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 19:25, Ian Bicking wrote: > Most of these could be added to the admin screens, so it would benefit > all. Well, user handling isn't standardized so that wouldn't work.

Re: [Webware-devel] What's needed for Webware 1.0? A braindeadinstaller

2002-04-09 Thread Ian Bicking
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 20:11, Terrel Shumway wrote: > > Most of these could be added to the admin screens, so it would benefit > > all. Well, user handling isn't standardized so that wouldn't work. > > > I hate browser-based admin screens 8-P (personal preference of course) Heresy! __

Re: [Webware-devel] What's needed for Webware 1.0?

2002-04-09 Thread Clark C . Evans
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:55:08AM -0500, Geoffrey Talvola wrote: | Now that 0.7 is out, I think it's high time that we moved Webware in the | direction of a 1.0 release. What things still need to be done? Apache 2.0 adapter. ;) Clark ___ Webware-dev

Re: [Webware-devel] What's needed for Webware 1.0? A braindeadinstaller

2002-04-09 Thread Tripp Lilley
On 9 Apr 2002, Terrel Shumway wrote: > I hate browser-based admin screens 8-P (personal preference of course) Agreed. As long as I can turn them off, and as long as all of the admin stuff is accessible programmatically, though, I don't object to the -existence- of browser-based admin screens :)

Re: [Webware-devel] What's needed for Webware 1.0? A braindeadinstaller

2002-04-09 Thread Tripp Lilley
On 8 Apr 2002, Terrel Shumway wrote: > * A 'native' HTTP server: > so I don't have to install apache and > figure out cgi stuff or mod_webkit What I'd -really- like to do is build a minimalist Apache package that's easy to tweak for each project that wants an "embedded" HTTP server.

Re: [Webware-devel] What's needed for Webware 1.0? A braindeadinstaller

2002-04-09 Thread Terrel Shumway
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 20:51, Tripp Lilley wrote: > We could take the pains to make a lean, mean Apache package What would it take to create a "lean, mean Apache"? mod_rewrite mod_webkit mod_ssl mod_auth_db mod_ssi (or mod_patch) cut out everything else? For future proofing, use Apache 2

Re: [Webware-devel] What's needed for Webware 1.0? A braindead installer

2002-04-09 Thread Clark C . Evans
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:37:24PM -0700, Terrel Shumway wrote: | On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 20:51, Tripp Lilley wrote: | > We could take the pains to make a lean, mean Apache package | | What would it take to create a "lean, mean Apache"? | | mod_rewrite | mod_webkit | mod_ssl | mod_auth_db |

Re: [Webware-devel] What's needed for Webware 1.0? A braindeadinstaller

2002-04-09 Thread Ian Bicking
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 23:37, Terrel Shumway wrote: > On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 20:51, Tripp Lilley wrote: > > We could take the pains to make a lean, mean Apache package > > What would it take to create a "lean, mean Apache"? > > mod_rewrite > mod_webkit > mod_ssl > mod_auth_db > mod_ssi (or

Re: [Webware-devel] What's needed for Webware 1.0? A braindeadinstaller

2002-04-09 Thread Tripp Lilley
On 10 Apr 2002, Ian Bicking wrote: > I think it wouldn't even include these -- rather, you'd also include > what mods were important to your particular project (i.e., Webware would > have mod_webkit, mod_rewrite, and mod_ssl -- mod_auth_db and mod_ssi > don't seem important to Webware -- another