On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> How common is it for a part of a page to be editable when the page is
> loaded, for there to be no formatting UI, for the page to not mind if the
> user uses the browser's own formatting features (e.g. dragging and
> dropping formatted text in
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Hugh Guiney wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > I haven't added this, because contenteditable="" is only truly useful
> > with scripting enabled, and it's basically one line of script to
> > support shunting the current value into a hidden in
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > Incidentally, it seems to use a WebKit-specific "plaintext-only" value.
> > > Should we spec that? Aryeh? It's filed as:
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> I haven't added this, because contenteditable="" is only truly useful with
> scripting enabled, and it's basically one line of script to support
> shunting the current value into a hidden input.
For me, it's also useful even just as a way fo
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 4:46 AM, David Young wrote:
> Aryeh and all,
>
> Initially I was attracted to the list because it seemed like virtually
> the only place where direct editing of web pages, especially via
> contentEditable, was under discussion.
>
> The main (or only?) thrust of the conversa
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 07:37:13PM +0200, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > Incidentally, it seems to use a WebKit-specific "plaintext-only" value.
> > Should we spec that? Aryeh? It's filed as:
> >
> >https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > Incidentally, it seems to use a WebKit-specific "plaintext-only" value.
> > Should we spec that? Aryeh? It's filed as:
> >
> >https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14554
> >
> > If thi
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Incidentally, it seems to use a WebKit-specific "plaintext-only" value.
> Should we spec that? Aryeh? It's filed as:
>
>https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14554
>
> If this should involve changes to HTML, let me know.
In princi
g'; a...@aryeh.name
Subject: RE: [whatwg] Submitting contentEditable Content In A Form -- also
in SVG and audio contexts
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, David Dailey wrote:
>
> I don't know if this matters or not, but at some point in time, other
> standards than HTML like or might receive
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, David Dailey wrote:
>
> I don't know if this matters or not, but at some point in time, other
> standards than HTML like or might receive sensible
> proposals to allow other media (than just text) to be contentEditable.
>
> Just as it makes sense to have built in text edit
On Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 7:24 PM
To: whatwg
Cc: a...@aryeh.name
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Submitting contentEditable Content In A Form
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Hugh Guiney wrote:
>
> I'm developing a CMS and would like to be able to submit user-edited
> co
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Hugh Guiney wrote:
>
> I'm developing a CMS and would like to be able to submit user-edited
> content back to the server, but at present, it's not possible to do this
> without copying the contents of the edited element with JavaScript into,
> say, a hidden form field. I thin
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Alain Couthures <
> alain.couthu...@agencexml.com> wrote:
>
>> Le 07/09/2012 12:32, Mikko Rantalainen a écrit :
>>
>> 2012-09-07 11:57 Europe/Helsinki: Hugh Guiney:
>>>
JavaScript into, say, a hidden form fi
Le 14/09/2012 09:50, Markus Ernst a écrit :
Am 13.09.2012 23:06 schrieb Ojan Vafai:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Alain Couthures <
alain.couthu...@agencexml.com> wrote:
Le 07/09/2012 12:32, Mikko Rantalainen a écrit :
2012-09-07 11:57 Europe/Helsinki: Hugh Guiney:
JavaScript into, say,
Am 13.09.2012 23:06 schrieb Ojan Vafai:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Alain Couthures <
alain.couthu...@agencexml.com> wrote:
Le 07/09/2012 12:32, Mikko Rantalainen a écrit :
2012-09-07 11:57 Europe/Helsinki: Hugh Guiney:
JavaScript into, say, a hidden form field. I think that there sho
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Alain Couthures <
alain.couthu...@agencexml.com> wrote:
> Le 07/09/2012 12:32, Mikko Rantalainen a écrit :
>
> 2012-09-07 11:57 Europe/Helsinki: Hugh Guiney:
>>
>>> JavaScript into, say, a hidden form field. I think that there should
>>> be some mechanism to associ
Le 07/09/2012 12:32, Mikko Rantalainen a écrit :
2012-09-07 11:57 Europe/Helsinki: Hugh Guiney:
JavaScript into, say, a hidden form field. I think that there should
be some mechanism to associate contentEditable elements with
forms—maybe the combination of contentEditable="true" and the presence
2012-09-07 11:57 Europe/Helsinki: Hugh Guiney:
> JavaScript into, say, a hidden form field. I think that there should
> be some mechanism to associate contentEditable elements with
> forms—maybe the combination of contentEditable="true" and the presence
> of @name creates an implicit form control?
I'm developing a CMS and would like to be able to submit user-edited
content back to the server, but at present, it's not possible to do
this without copying the contents of the edited element with
JavaScript into, say, a hidden form field. I think that there should
be some mechanism to associate c
19 matches
Mail list logo
