Re: [Wicket-user] Current Wicket-Examples 2.0 and slf4j

Ah, its for examples. Too ill to notice. Yes, I agree there. Erik. Johan Compagner schreef: > but that is stupid for examples > We should provide a default impl for our examles > Examples should run out of the box. > > johan > > > On 1/2/07, *Erik van Oosten * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: [Wicket-user] Current Wicket-Examples 2.0 and slf4j

but that is stupid for examples We should provide a default impl for our examles Examples should run out of the box. johan On 1/2/07, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You probably have to select a SLF4J implementation yourself. You can find implementations on http://www.slf4j.org/.

Re: [Wicket-user] Current Wicket-Examples 2.0 and slf4j

You probably have to select a SLF4J implementation yourself. You can find implementations on http://www.slf4j.org/. If you want to keep the old commons-logging behavior, choose slf4j-jcl.jar. Regards, Erik. Stefan Lindner wrote: > Whe I deploy the current Wicket-Examples 2.0 that is built