[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Conrad Irwin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Conrad Irwin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com --- Comment #8 from St

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Conrad Irwin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Irwin 2010-01-29 22:37:01 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=7050) --> (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7050) A "for interest" patch implementing {{subst}} This is an alternative solution, instead o

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #5 from Voyagerfan5761 2010-01-29 03:21:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > As a feature requst, I think this belongs in a separate bug. The shortcode > system looks more like normal tag extensions/parser functions/templates to m

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Irwin 2010-01-28 20:16:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Adding a hook at this point in the parse would be similar to WordPress' > "shortcode" system, the way I see it. That system has proven to be useful for

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #3 from Voyagerfan5761 2010-01-28 19:28:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=7043) --> (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7043) [details] > A patch to provide this > > I have attached a p

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Danny B. changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dann...@email.cz -- Configure bugmail: htt

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Irwin 2010-01-28 15:20:19 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=7044) --> (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7044) Same as previous patch with subst-if-substed: instead of safesubst: This patch incorpora

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Conrad Irwin changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bu

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Irwin 2010-01-28 14:49:22 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=7043) --> (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7043) A patch to provide this I have attached a patch which implements the proposed change by

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Voyagerfan5761 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mediaw...@technobabbl.es -- Configur