http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176
Summary: WPKG Service crashes when using Offline mode
Product: WPKG Client
Version: 1.3.9
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Hi Simon,
reading this list with its native interface - i.e. with a mail client - there
is no evidence of such a formatting at all, even when looking at the message's
source.
Anyway, as you're not using checks I assume your installations either execute
every time you run WPKG or you've set exec
I don't know how you are viewing my message but when I view it on Nabble - it
shows the relavent part of the documentation in bold :)
Please just look at the documentation in wpkg.js about noremove especially
the last bit
regards
Simon
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-B
Hi Simon,
simplesi wrote:
> Are you saying the documentation is wrong and that /noremove will not remove
> packages under any circumstances?
> from wpkg.js 1.1.2
Which part of the documentation is wrong? The one you quote below...
>> /noremove \n" +
>> "Disable the removal of all packages.
Rainer Meier wrote:
>
>
> Could you explain this "certain circumstances" in a bit more detail
> because it
> might be a bug. I've checked the code and wpkg.xml entries are only
> removed in
> the removePackage function. And all of them are completely skipped if the
> /noremove flag (or noremove
Hi Simon,
simplesi wrote:
> Starting from the beginning again :)
>
> I adminster several small school networks and use wpkg to deploy packages to
> several machines if it is quicker to use wpkg than to go around all
> computers and do a manual install.
Same here. Well, that's what WPKG was desig
Starting from the beginning again :)
I adminster several small school networks and use wpkg to deploy packages to
several machines if it is quicker to use wpkg than to go around all
computers and do a manual install.
I want to be able to test a new package out or a modified one on an existing
li
Hello Simplesi,
> If you add a few if/else statements (I'm more than willing to supply the
> code changes from my modded version) then all I'd have to do everytime the
> main codebase changes is to redo my mods for the removeSettingsNode
> function
> itself.
please let us have a look at your chan
Hi Simon,
simplesi wrote:
> I am trying to stop WPKG removing wpkg.xml entries if there are no remove
> instructions in a package
And exactly here I don't see where the use-case is which would not break the
existing specification/purpose of WPKG. If the entry would stay within wpkg.xml
then WPKG
I hadn't realised that WPKG removed an wpkg.xml entry before upgrading it -
(e.g line 614) so my initial modification request is no longer valid :(
I'll have to learn more and try again in the future :)
> If this is not what you want to achieve please explain your use-case in
> more detail.
>
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Meier 2009-10-04 17:52:24 ---
In answer to the following reply on the mailing list:
Simon wrote:
If it never happens - then users won't see the messages :)
This is just part of my endless attempts to get WPKG to not r
If it never happens - then users won't see the messages :)
This is just part of my endless attempts to get WPKG to not remove packages
from wpkg.xml if there are no positive instructions to do.
If you add a few if/else statements (I'm more than willing to supply the
code changes from my modded
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175
Rainer Meier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175
Summary: Test return value of removeSettingsNode function
Product: WPKG
Version: other
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
14 matches
Mail list logo
