Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Thierry Koblentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://tjkdesign.com/articles/user_defined_accesskeys.asp thanks thierry, i know this will be a good one. cheers, dwain -- "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neit

Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Gonzalo González Mora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:25 PM, dwain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dwain, > You might find this article interesting: > http://www.rnib.org.uk/wacblog/articles/too-much-accessibility/too-too-much-accessibility-acc

RE: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of dwain > Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 7:25 PM > To: web standards group > Subject: [WSG] best practices for using access keys > > i've read the following two articles and i would entertain some > fee

Re: [WSG] Google chrome...

Check this Read the Book.. http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/index.html Srini On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Nancy Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing I have noticed today is that it creates 3 different processes in > the Task Manager to run one coyp of chrome. I have tested this

Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:25 PM, dwain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i've read the following two articles and i would entertain some > feedback on using access keys. i'm slowly bringing my web site up to > better accessibility standards and i have a few more things to do like > add a skip nav link

[WSG] best practices for using access keys

i've read the following two articles and i would entertain some feedback on using access keys. i'm slowly bringing my web site up to better accessibility standards and i have a few more things to do like add a skip nav link and access keys. any other articles and resources would be appreciated fo

Re: [WSG] Google chrome...

Has anyone noticed how Hotmail is 'unavailable' in Chrome?? Recommending one upgrades to either: IE, FF or Safari. Could this be a snub by Microsoft?? Innocent browser compatability issue? What's the opinion? Seconds out...Round 3 2008/9/5 Michael Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Because that i

[WSG] Petition to save John Slatin’s Accessibility Institute

I'm making my first steps regarding web accessibility, and today I was checking the RNIB.org.uk website when I found this news articlein their blog. I quote: "John Slatin, a respected member of the

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

> The short answer is yes > > Details of the accessibility of internet Explorer can be found in the > VPAT (voluntary product accessibility template) supplied by Microsoft: > (http://download.microsoft.com/download/c/2/3/c23bc250-5f80-4d0c-a29d-877355ff > 91e8/IE7_VPAT%20version%201%200.doc) Than

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

Hi Christian, > Just clear up my understanding, folks; is Internet Explorer accessible > because Microsoft builds the accessibility features The short answer is yes Details of the accessibility of internet Explorer can be found in the VPAT (voluntary product accessibility template) supplied by Mi

Re: [WSG] Accessibility Help

> Because it's HTML it's accessible. Ah, no, not always. If a web user has a cognitive disability, requiring them to perform a math function (cognitive ability) may be another accessibility barrier itself. YMMV, of course, depending upon the accessibility standard you wish to achieve, or you may

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam Martin skrev: >> >> Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been >> raised - but I do think that we need to wait until it is out of beta. > > A beta is supposed to be feature complete. otherwois

Re: [WSG] Chrome JavaScript features - not speed

Breton Slivka skrev: >> - Array and string generics > > You can apply array functions to strings, if that's what you mean. > And vice versa >> - Expression closures > > I don't know how you could have javascript without those. Pretty much > every website would break. Event handlers would be impo

Re: [WSG] Chrome JavaScript features - not speed

Just playing around in the console.. On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Concerning Chrome, I have some unanswered questions about V8. > > Exactly what JavaScript features does it support? (This is NOT a question > about it's speed.) > > The release statememt sim

[WSG] Chrome JavaScript features - not speed

Concerning Chrome, I have some unanswered questions about V8. Exactly what JavaScript features does it support? (This is NOT a question about it's speed.) The release statememt simply says that it follows the EcmaScript 3.0 standard, but we all know that it is quirky in places and that curren

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

Adam Martin skrev: Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been raised - but I do think that we need to wait until it is out of beta. A beta is supposed to be feature complete. otherwoise it's an alpha. Lars Gunther **