On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.05.16 at 15:58, wrote:
>> Case 1: Dom0 is driver domain:
>> There is a Ducati firmware which runs on dedicated M4 core and decodes
>> video. This firmware uses hardcoded physical addresses for graphics
>> buffers. Those addresses shou
Oleksandr Dmytryshyn | Product Engineering and Development
GlobalLogic
M +38.067.382.2525
www.globallogic.com
http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello Oleksandr,
>
>
> On 19/05/16 14:58, Oleksandr Dmytryshyn wrote:
>>>
>>> Why
> My bottom line is the error reporting mechanism needs to be preserved,
> otherwise we risk breaking other users. Libxl currently relies on those
> nodes to report error.
Got it.
Andrii Anisov | Associate Manager, Engineering
GlobalLogic
Kyiv, 03038, Protasov Business Park, M.Grinchenka, 2/1
P +
flight 94592 qemu-upstream-4.3-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/94592/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REG
flight 94594 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/94594/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 94588
build-amd64
The pv_time_ops structure contains a function pointer for the
"steal_clock" functionality used only by KVM and Xen on ARM. Xen on x86
uses its own mechanism to account for the "stolen" time a thread wasn't
able to run due to hypervisor scheduling.
Add support in Xen arch independent time handling
On 19/05/16 19:15, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2016, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> The pv_time_ops structure contains a function pointer for the
>> "steal_clock" functionality used only by KVM and Xen on ARM. Xen on x86
>> uses its own mechanism to account for the "stolen" time a thread wa
On May 17, 2016 10:00 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 22.04.16 at 12:54, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> > @@ -206,10 +206,71 @@ static int invalidate_sync(struct iommu *iommu)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void de
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
