On 19-12-2014 22:23, Herbert Xu wrote:
David Vrabel wrote:
After d75b1ade567ffab085e8adbbdacf0092d10cd09c (net: less interrupt
masking in NAPI) the napi instance is removed from the per-cpu list
prior to calling the n->poll(), and is only requeued if all of the
budget was used. This inadverten
From: Herbert Xu
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:23:27 +1100
> The commit d75b1ade567ffab085e8adbbdacf0092d10cd09c (net: less
> interrupt masking in NAPI) breaks virtio_net in an insidious way.
>
> It is now required that if the entire budget is consumed when poll
> returns, the napi poll_list must re
On 12/20/2014 08:23 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> David Vrabel wrote:
>> After d75b1ade567ffab085e8adbbdacf0092d10cd09c (net: less interrupt
>> masking in NAPI) the napi instance is removed from the per-cpu list
>> prior to calling the n->poll(), and is only requeued if all of the
>> budget was used.
David Vrabel wrote:
> After d75b1ade567ffab085e8adbbdacf0092d10cd09c (net: less interrupt
> masking in NAPI) the napi instance is removed from the per-cpu list
> prior to calling the n->poll(), and is only requeued if all of the
> budget was used. This inadvertently broke netfront because netfron
