On 2017-08-07 15:53, Mike "Pomax" Kamermans wrote:
> On 8/6/2017 6:38 PM, Bobby de Vos wrote:
>> He also thinks fontconfig/freetype should be enhanced so TrueType
>> (and I would add OpenType) fonts are prioritized before WOFF.
>
> The idea of "installing" a WOFF resource for serving by an OS font
On 8/6/2017 6:38 PM, Bobby de Vos wrote:
He also thinks fontconfig/freetype should be enhanced so TrueType (and
I would add OpenType) fonts are prioritized before WOFF.
The idea of "installing" a WOFF resource for serving by an OS font
manager is... bad? That's not what WOFF are for, they are
On 2017-04-06 09:27, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> On 06/04/2017 15:53, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
>> 2017-04-06 15:31 GMT+02:00 Ulrike Fischer :
>>> Am Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:10:06 -0600 schrieb Bobby de Vos:
>>>
On 2017-04-06 02:39, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> On the whole I would agree with the debian answe
On 2017-04-06 07:31, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> Am Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:10:06 -0600 schrieb Bobby de Vos:
>
>> On 2017-04-06 02:39, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
>>> On the whole I would agree with the debian answer: applications like
>>> xetex/xdvipdfmx shouldn't try to use fonts it can't handle.
>> Thank you
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
I wished you would clean up the messages a bit before sending. It is
horribly hard to read if you burry a three liner in the middle of
all sorts of citations and signatures.
I am normally in favour of (extremely) heavy trimming, but in this case
it is not possible to unambi
On 06/04/2017 15:53, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
2017-04-06 15:31 GMT+02:00 Ulrike Fischer :
Am Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:10:06 -0600 schrieb Bobby de Vos:
On 2017-04-06 02:39, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
On the whole I would agree with the debian answer: applications like
xetex/xdvipdfmx shouldn't try to use fo
I wished you would clean up the messages a bit before sending. It is
horribly hard to read if you burry a three liner in the middle of
all sorts of citations and signatures.
--
Ulrike Fischer
http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/
--
Subscription
2017-04-06 15:31 GMT+02:00 Ulrike Fischer :
> Am Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:10:06 -0600 schrieb Bobby de Vos:
>
>> On 2017-04-06 02:39, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
>>> On the whole I would agree with the debian answer: applications like
>>> xetex/xdvipdfmx shouldn't try to use fonts it can't handle.
>>
>> Thank
Am Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:10:06 -0600 schrieb Bobby de Vos:
> On 2017-04-06 02:39, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
>> On the whole I would agree with the debian answer: applications like
>> xetex/xdvipdfmx shouldn't try to use fonts it can't handle.
>
> Thank you for your response. I will file a bug with Debi
On 2017-04-06 02:39, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> On the whole I would agree with the debian answer: applications like
> xetex/xdvipdfmx shouldn't try to use fonts it can't handle.
Thank you for your response. I will file a bug with Debian at some point.
> On windows where fontconfig is used only by
Am Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:36:27 -0600 schrieb Bobby de Vos:
> Greetings,
>
> I have seen reports of problems on XeTeX on Ubuntu not handling woff
> files, both told to me in person and also on the web [1]. I am now
> taking over the Debian/Ubuntu packaging for some fonts (Scheherazade
> included) and
11 matches
Mail list logo