On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:42:03PM -0700, ext Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2011 18:18:14 +0300, ville.syrj...@nokia.com wrote:
> > The proposed DRI@ invalidate patch [1] causes a lot more invalidate events
> > to be sent out. That will cause processes to wake up needlessly. Eg. if
> > an unr
On Fri, 6 May 2011 18:18:14 +0300, ville.syrj...@nokia.com wrote:
> The proposed DRI@ invalidate patch [1] causes a lot more invalidate events
> to be sent out. That will cause processes to wake up needlessly. Eg. if
> an unredirected fullscreen app is flipping, each flip will also send an
> inval
The proposed DRI@ invalidate patch [1] causes a lot more invalidate events
to be sent out. That will cause processes to wake up needlessly. Eg. if
an unredirected fullscreen app is flipping, each flip will also send an
invalidate event to the compositor, since the composite overlay and client
windo