Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-20 Thread anthony
I just hate thinking of GM arriving at congress with their hats in their
hands stepping out from their private jets. I mean for real?
A




On Wed, November 19, 2008 3:25 pm, J.C. wrote:
 On 18 November 2008, Dan Sicko wrote:

 I just want to ask the question -- do you think the banks that were
 bailed out made better business decisions than the Big 3 over the last
 decade?

 I don't think either should have been bailed out.  It even was a one
 issue election, based on the banking bailout, for me.  (Which meant I
 only voted AGAINST one incumbent.)



 --
 San Francisco Bay Guardian's Readers Choice Award Winner: Best Radio DJ:
 http://www.sfbg.com/promo/pollpositions.php
 AIM: jckzsu (or kzsudj during my show.)

 Opinions are my own only, and do not necessarily represent those of
 KZSU Radio or Stanford University. (or words to that effect.)






Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-20 Thread Michael Kuszynski
Maybe it is time for 'change'

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:46 AM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I just hate thinking of GM arriving at congress with their hats in their
 hands stepping out from their private jets. I mean for real?
 A




 On Wed, November 19, 2008 3:25 pm, J.C. wrote:
 On 18 November 2008, Dan Sicko wrote:

 I just want to ask the question -- do you think the banks that were
 bailed out made better business decisions than the Big 3 over the last
 decade?

 I don't think either should have been bailed out.  It even was a one
 issue election, based on the banking bailout, for me.  (Which meant I
 only voted AGAINST one incumbent.)



 --
 San Francisco Bay Guardian's Readers Choice Award Winner: Best Radio DJ:
 http://www.sfbg.com/promo/pollpositions.php
 AIM: jckzsu (or kzsudj during my show.)

 Opinions are my own only, and do not necessarily represent those of
 KZSU Radio or Stanford University. (or words to that effect.)








-- 
---
Michael Kuszynski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.planerecordings.com
New York, NY


Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-18 Thread Michael Kuszynski
The deeper questions are:

If you don't bail out the big american banks, will the financial
system collapse?

If you don't bail out the american auto makers, will the auto industry collapse?

Yes. No.

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Dan Sicko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I just want to ask the question -- do you think the banks that were
 bailed out made better business decisions than the Big 3 over the last
 decade?

 -d

 On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:39 PM, theREAL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 No, but I don't have to. I worked there for 31 years - 28 of it right down
 on the assembly line. I know enough to say with authority that nobody made
 that kind of cash unless he or she worked some hefty overtime hours. On the
 40 hours that I got most of the time, I pulled in right around 40k a year.
 Anyone who says anything else (and as I retied an International UAW-GM rep,
 I have some knowledge here) about the average guy on the line doing a normal
 work week is full of BS. I've read many an article which inflated our wages,
 our benefits, our time off, and what we made while laid off which spun some
 pretty tall tales.
 I'm not saying it wasn't a good paying job with excellent benefits. I'm
 saying don't believe everything you read about a job most people simply
 would not do (I'm talking the assembly line here). It can be an a$$kickingly
 hard place to work, and the jobs which aren't are few and far between these
 days.


jeff

 Anyone remeber the article in the Free Press about the janitor at GM
 making 60 or 70k a year when he retired?






 --
 -
 Dan Sicko
 Editor, Moodmat
 www.moodmat.com




-- 
---
Michael Kuszynski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.planerecordings.com
New York, NY


Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-18 Thread theREAL



The deeper questions are:

If you don't bail out the big american banks, will the financial
system collapse?

If you don't bail out the american auto makers, will the auto industry collapse?

Yes. No.

  

And you know this how?
Too bad people with so much clarity of vision haven't been in charge of 
things - oh, wait. They have been.
Not only is it likely the industry will collapse, it's importance to the 
infrastructure of the national economy runs deeper than your apparent 
understanding.

I'm not arguing here - obviously, you have the answers all neatly bundled.

   jeff



Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-18 Thread Joel Gajewski
Are you talking net or gross?  My friend started working for GM around 2000 and 
his hourly wage was around $18-$20 and I was jealous at the time.  

FTR, I am not anti GM or Ford, I just refuse to buy their cars as I got tired 
of spending time/money on fixing them.  Plus, the service at my last Ford 
dealership was outright terrible.  This collapse, if it happens, will be 
tragic.  Very sad.

Poor business models don't have much longevity.   When did Ford or GM start to 
offer hybrids?  Last year?  It's not a secret that fossil fuels are limited in 
quantity.  Also, I think the financial sector has made just as many bad 
decisions as the automakers have.   



- Original Message 
From: theREAL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: list 313 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 4:39:39 PM
Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose 
out, I think Detroit would go under

No, but I don't have to. I worked there for 31 years - 28 of it right 
down on the assembly line. I know enough to say with authority that 
nobody made that kind of cash unless he or she worked some hefty 
overtime hours. On the 40 hours that I got most of the time, I pulled in 
right around 40k a year.
Anyone who says anything else (and as I retied an International UAW-GM 
rep, I have some knowledge here) about the average guy on the line doing 
a normal work week is full of BS. I've read many an article which 
inflated our wages, our benefits, our time off, and what we made while 
laid off which spun some pretty tall tales.
I'm not saying it wasn't a good paying job with excellent benefits. I'm 
saying don't believe everything you read about a job most people simply 
would not do (I'm talking the assembly line here). It can be an 
a$$kickingly hard place to work, and the jobs which aren't are few and 
far between these days.

                                                                        
                                jeff
 Anyone remeber the article in the Free Press about the janitor at GM making 
 60 or 70k a year when he retired?  

 


Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-18 Thread theREAL


Are you talking net or gross?  My friend started working for GM around 2000 and his hourly wage was around $18-$20 and I was jealous at the time.  
  
Net, of course. And please don't take my remarks as being in support of 
SUV's in general or stupid mfg/marketing decisions made by the big 3.

I'm not. Something HAS to change in their business models.
My point is that I believe there is a general ignorance concerning the 
ripple effects if we let them slide into the toity.
Much more will follow if that happens - and it will take much more time 
and $ to fix it.




j


Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-18 Thread theREAL
Correction - I meant gross. W/o overtime, I pulled in between 40-45 k 
per year.



 j


theREAL wrote:


Are you talking net or gross?  My friend started working for GM 
around 2000 and his hourly wage was around $18-$20 and I was jealous 
at the time.
Net, of course. And please don't take my remarks as being in support 
of SUV's in general or stupid mfg/marketing decisions made by the big 3.

I'm not. Something HAS to change in their business models.
My point is that I believe there is a general ignorance concerning the 
ripple effects if we let them slide into the toity.
Much more will follow if that happens - and it will take much more 
time and $ to fix it.




j






Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-17 Thread Joel Gajewski
Anyone remeber the article in the Free Press about the janitor at GM making 60 
or 70k a year when he retired?  



- Original Message 
From: Michael Kuszynski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Joel Gajewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; list 313 313@hyperreal.org; Martin 
Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 11:50:06 AM
Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose 
out, I think Detroit would go under

If you don't pay executives they will go run other companies who will.



On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:10 AM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 a few months ago (in May) GM put Rick Wagoner's salary back up to $2.2
 million
 taking him off his self-imposed pay cut

 and now he wants a government bail-out?  He'll do perfectly fine with or
 without one.
 He wants to save his company?  Make him, and all of GMs top executives, pay
 for it.

 the company is a complete failure because of personal greed


 MEK

 Joel Gajewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 10:37:11
 AM:

 As sad as it is for life in Detroit, the US auto industry has not
 exactly learned any lessons from the 70's/80's when foreign cars
 started picking up in terms of sales.  Plus, they neglect the
 American market in terms of style, performance and most importantly
 quality.  They should have known that their busines plans based on
 large trucks and SUV's in the 1990's would only last for so long.

 I have known far too many people that work in the industry and feel
 that they are owed something and have very little pride in their
 work, which is a huge cause in the lack of quality.  I had two sides
 of my family working for Ford or Chrysler (pre Daimler) and sadly
 this is really what I saw growing up.

 I had two Chyslers and one Ford, none of which made it past 100k.
 Well, the Ford I dumped with 36k because it was already having problems.


 This might not be a popular view, but it is my honest opinion and it
 pains me to say it as I love Detroit and all of my family there.

 It's sad really.


 - Original Message 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: list 313 313@hyperreal.org
 Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:44:31 AM
 Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors
 were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

 We're not recyclers, he said of his countrymen. We're consumers of
 products.
 the problem in a nutshell



 MEK




 Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 09:06:49 AM:

  grim reading:
 

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/14/ford-chrysler-general-motors
 
  m





-- 
---
Michael Kuszynski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.planerecordings.com
New York, NY



Re: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-17 Thread Greg Earle

Joel Gajewski wrote:
As sad as it is for life in Detroit, the US auto industry has not 
exactly learned any lessons from the 70's/80's when foreign cars 
started picking up in terms of sales.  Plus, they neglect the American 
market in terms of style, performance and most importantly quality.  
They should have known that their business plans based on large trucks 
and SUV's in the 1990's would only last for so long.


I'm not from Detroit, so Detroiters, feel free to tell me to STFU.

But I do have this observation to make:

I just came back from a 2 1/2 week trek to Tanzania  Zanzibar.

Discounting the usual big Land Rover and Land Cruiser vehicles that are 
the staples of the safari tour co.'s, when it comes to passenger cars 
and non-commercial vehicles, I'd say that at least 95% of the total 
vehicles I saw in that category in the country were Japanese.  I don't 
recall seeing a single GM or Ford vehicle there at all.  While being 
driven to my hotel in Dar es Salaam, we fell in behind a vehicle from 
the American Embassy.  It was a (consumer) Land Cruiser.  Oh the irony.


It seems so simple to fix - the Big 3 should switch to making good, 
cheap (so a lot of the population can afford it) reliable small cars 
that get good gas mileage and that're easy to fix, and do this globally 
so that an ecosystem can spring up around it and ensure that people can 
get them fixed easily if they have problems.


But at the same time, discounting their world-wide presence for a 
moment, the US automakers are at the whims of the American consumer.  If 
suddenly tomorrow GM and Ford and Chrysler sent reps to Tanzania and 
discovered the Japanese blanket coverage there and tried to emulate it, 
what if consumers back home won't buy them?  What if, now that gas is 
down (to $2.65 for Premium out here in LA; undoubtedly less in other 
places, and obviously less than that for Regular) a bit, the usual 
American penchant for overconsumption kicks back in and they decide they 
want their guzzling SUVs and huge trucks again?


The Big 3 are like a lumbering beast, unable to turn on a dime and do 
the right thing for the environment and the economy, but it's the 
American buying public that are equally to blame.  I don't have an 
answer to their ills - it seems like a classic Catch-22.  I wish I did - 
for the sake of all my Detroit friends whose livelihoods are affected 
either directly or indirectly by the Auto Industry.  And so that people 
can go back to going to shows - and support Detroit's music scene.


   - Greg




Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-17 Thread theREAL
No, but I don't have to. I worked there for 31 years - 28 of it right 
down on the assembly line. I know enough to say with authority that 
nobody made that kind of cash unless he or she worked some hefty 
overtime hours. On the 40 hours that I got most of the time, I pulled in 
right around 40k a year.
Anyone who says anything else (and as I retied an International UAW-GM 
rep, I have some knowledge here) about the average guy on the line doing 
a normal work week is full of BS. I've read many an article which 
inflated our wages, our benefits, our time off, and what we made while 
laid off which spun some pretty tall tales.
I'm not saying it wasn't a good paying job with excellent benefits. I'm 
saying don't believe everything you read about a job most people simply 
would not do (I'm talking the assembly line here). It can be an 
a$$kickingly hard place to work, and the jobs which aren't are few and 
far between these days.



jeff
Anyone remeber the article in the Free Press about the janitor at GM making 60 or 70k a year when he retired?  

  




RE: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-17 Thread Paul Thurston

Yep, that was me.  I wouldn't enter a cubicle for less than $100.

-Original Message-
From: Joel Gajewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 6:05 AM
To: Michael Kuszynski
Cc: list 313
Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to
lose out, I think Detroit would go under

Anyone remeber the article in the Free Press about the janitor at GM making
60 or 70k a year when he retired?  



- Original Message 
From: Michael Kuszynski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Joel Gajewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; list 313
313@hyperreal.org; Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 11:50:06 AM
Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to
lose out, I think Detroit would go under

If you don't pay executives they will go run other companies who will.



On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:10 AM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 a few months ago (in May) GM put Rick Wagoner's salary back up to $2.2
 million
 taking him off his self-imposed pay cut

 and now he wants a government bail-out?  He'll do perfectly fine with or
 without one.
 He wants to save his company?  Make him, and all of GMs top executives,
pay
 for it.

 the company is a complete failure because of personal greed


 MEK

 Joel Gajewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 10:37:11
 AM:

 As sad as it is for life in Detroit, the US auto industry has not
 exactly learned any lessons from the 70's/80's when foreign cars
 started picking up in terms of sales.  Plus, they neglect the
 American market in terms of style, performance and most importantly
 quality.  They should have known that their busines plans based on
 large trucks and SUV's in the 1990's would only last for so long.

 I have known far too many people that work in the industry and feel
 that they are owed something and have very little pride in their
 work, which is a huge cause in the lack of quality.  I had two sides
 of my family working for Ford or Chrysler (pre Daimler) and sadly
 this is really what I saw growing up.

 I had two Chyslers and one Ford, none of which made it past 100k.
 Well, the Ford I dumped with 36k because it was already having problems.


 This might not be a popular view, but it is my honest opinion and it
 pains me to say it as I love Detroit and all of my family there.

 It's sad really.


 - Original Message 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: list 313 313@hyperreal.org
 Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:44:31 AM
 Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors
 were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

 We're not recyclers, he said of his countrymen. We're consumers of
 products.
 the problem in a nutshell



 MEK




 Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 09:06:49 AM:

  grim reading:
 


http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/14/ford-chrysler-general-motors
 
  m





-- 
---
Michael Kuszynski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.planerecordings.com
New York, NY

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.4/1794 - Release Date: 11/17/2008
8:48 AM



Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-17 Thread Dan Sicko
I just want to ask the question -- do you think the banks that were
bailed out made better business decisions than the Big 3 over the last
decade?

-d

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:39 PM, theREAL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 No, but I don't have to. I worked there for 31 years - 28 of it right down
 on the assembly line. I know enough to say with authority that nobody made
 that kind of cash unless he or she worked some hefty overtime hours. On the
 40 hours that I got most of the time, I pulled in right around 40k a year.
 Anyone who says anything else (and as I retied an International UAW-GM rep,
 I have some knowledge here) about the average guy on the line doing a normal
 work week is full of BS. I've read many an article which inflated our wages,
 our benefits, our time off, and what we made while laid off which spun some
 pretty tall tales.
 I'm not saying it wasn't a good paying job with excellent benefits. I'm
 saying don't believe everything you read about a job most people simply
 would not do (I'm talking the assembly line here). It can be an a$$kickingly
 hard place to work, and the jobs which aren't are few and far between these
 days.


jeff

 Anyone remeber the article in the Free Press about the janitor at GM
 making 60 or 70k a year when he retired?






-- 
-
Dan Sicko
Editor, Moodmat
www.moodmat.com


(313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-14 Thread Martin Dust

grim reading:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/14/ford-chrysler-general-motors

m


Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-14 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
We're not recyclers, he said of his countrymen. We're consumers of
products.
the problem in a nutshell



MEK




Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 09:06:49 AM:

 grim reading:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/14/ford-chrysler-general-motors

 m



Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-14 Thread Joel Gajewski
As sad as it is for life in Detroit, the US auto industry has not exactly 
learned any lessons from the 70's/80's when foreign cars started picking up in 
terms of sales.  Plus, they neglect the American market in terms of style, 
performance and most importantly quality.  They should have known that their 
busines plans based on large trucks and SUV's in the 1990's would only last for 
so long.  

I have known far too many people that work in the industry and feel that they 
are owed something and have very little pride in their work, which is a huge 
cause in the lack of quality.  I had two sides of my family working for Ford or 
Chrysler (pre Daimler) and sadly this is really what I saw growing up.  

I had two Chyslers and one Ford, none of which made it past 100k.  Well, the 
Ford I dumped with 36k because it was already having problems.  

This might not be a popular view, but it is my honest opinion and it pains me 
to say it as I love Detroit and all of my family there.  

It's sad really.  


- Original Message 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: list 313 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:44:31 AM
Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose 
out, I think Detroit would go under

We're not recyclers, he said of his countrymen. We're consumers of
products.
the problem in a nutshell



MEK




Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 09:06:49 AM:

 grim reading:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/14/ford-chrysler-general-motors

 m


Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-14 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
a few months ago (in May) GM put Rick Wagoner's salary back up to $2.2
million
taking him off his self-imposed pay cut

and now he wants a government bail-out?  He'll do perfectly fine with or
without one.
He wants to save his company?  Make him, and all of GMs top executives, pay
for it.

the company is a complete failure because of personal greed


MEK

Joel Gajewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 10:37:11
AM:

 As sad as it is for life in Detroit, the US auto industry has not
 exactly learned any lessons from the 70's/80's when foreign cars
 started picking up in terms of sales.  Plus, they neglect the
 American market in terms of style, performance and most importantly
 quality.  They should have known that their busines plans based on
 large trucks and SUV's in the 1990's would only last for so long.

 I have known far too many people that work in the industry and feel
 that they are owed something and have very little pride in their
 work, which is a huge cause in the lack of quality.  I had two sides
 of my family working for Ford or Chrysler (pre Daimler) and sadly
 this is really what I saw growing up.

 I had two Chyslers and one Ford, none of which made it past 100k.
 Well, the Ford I dumped with 36k because it was already having problems.


 This might not be a popular view, but it is my honest opinion and it
 pains me to say it as I love Detroit and all of my family there.

 It's sad really.


 - Original Message 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: list 313 313@hyperreal.org
 Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:44:31 AM
 Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors
 were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

 We're not recyclers, he said of his countrymen. We're consumers of
 products.
 the problem in a nutshell



 MEK




 Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 09:06:49 AM:

  grim reading:
 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/14/ford-chrysler-general-motors
 
  m



Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-14 Thread Michael Kuszynski
If you don't pay executives they will go run other companies who will.



On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:10 AM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 a few months ago (in May) GM put Rick Wagoner's salary back up to $2.2
 million
 taking him off his self-imposed pay cut

 and now he wants a government bail-out?  He'll do perfectly fine with or
 without one.
 He wants to save his company?  Make him, and all of GMs top executives, pay
 for it.

 the company is a complete failure because of personal greed


 MEK

 Joel Gajewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 10:37:11
 AM:

 As sad as it is for life in Detroit, the US auto industry has not
 exactly learned any lessons from the 70's/80's when foreign cars
 started picking up in terms of sales.  Plus, they neglect the
 American market in terms of style, performance and most importantly
 quality.  They should have known that their busines plans based on
 large trucks and SUV's in the 1990's would only last for so long.

 I have known far too many people that work in the industry and feel
 that they are owed something and have very little pride in their
 work, which is a huge cause in the lack of quality.  I had two sides
 of my family working for Ford or Chrysler (pre Daimler) and sadly
 this is really what I saw growing up.

 I had two Chyslers and one Ford, none of which made it past 100k.
 Well, the Ford I dumped with 36k because it was already having problems.


 This might not be a popular view, but it is my honest opinion and it
 pains me to say it as I love Detroit and all of my family there.

 It's sad really.


 - Original Message 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: list 313 313@hyperreal.org
 Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:44:31 AM
 Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors
 were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

 We're not recyclers, he said of his countrymen. We're consumers of
 products.
 the problem in a nutshell



 MEK




 Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 09:06:49 AM:

  grim reading:
 

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/14/ford-chrysler-general-motors
 
  m





-- 
---
Michael Kuszynski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.planerecordings.com
New York, NY


Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-14 Thread Matt Kane's Brain
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:50, Michael Kuszynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If you don't pay executives they will go run other companies who will.

Not always a bad thing.

--
matt kane's brain
techno radio at: http://hydrogenproject.com http://wzbc.org
capoeira in boston http://capoeirageraisusa.com
aim - mkbatwerk ; y! - mkb218 ; gtalk - mkb.dirtyorg


Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-14 Thread Michael Kuszynski
That's for the shareholder's and board of directors to decide, and if
it comes to it, the federal government which becomes a stakeholder if
they provide a capital injection in exchange for preferred shares
through the TARP program (which it doesn't look like it will happen).

And if the board of directors and shareholders like whoever is running
it, then I think it's up to them to decide how to mismanage the
company, because it's owned by these stakeholders, not an outraged
populist regime.

Anyways, my $.02 is done here because it's not related to techno.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Matt Kane's Brain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:50, Michael Kuszynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If you don't pay executives they will go run other companies who will.

 Not always a bad thing.

 --
 matt kane's brain
 techno radio at: http://hydrogenproject.com http://wzbc.org
 capoeira in boston http://capoeirageraisusa.com
 aim - mkbatwerk ; y! - mkb218 ; gtalk - mkb.dirtyorg




-- 
---
Michael Kuszynski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.planerecordings.com
New York, NY


RE: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to lose out, I think Detroit would go under

2008-11-14 Thread Paul Thurston
The Fiat Uno was a pretty good car. It's being re-released in 2008, I think
by GM, based on a Ford Ka chassis though. Italians do it better eh?

-Original Message-
From: Joel Gajewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 5:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Martin Dust
Cc: list 313
Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to
lose out, I think Detroit would go under

As sad as it is for life in Detroit, the US auto industry has not exactly
learned any lessons from the 70's/80's when foreign cars started picking up
in terms of sales.  Plus, they neglect the American market in terms of
style, performance and most importantly quality.  They should have known
that their busines plans based on large trucks and SUV's in the 1990's would
only last for so long.  

I have known far too many people that work in the industry and feel
that they are owed something and have very little pride in their work, which
is a huge cause in the lack of quality.  I had two sides of my family
working for Ford or Chrysler (pre Daimler) and sadly this is really what I
saw growing up.  

I had two Chyslers and one Ford, none of which made it past 100k.  Well, the
Ford I dumped with 36k because it was already having problems.  

This might not be a popular view, but it is my honest opinion and it pains
me to say it as I love Detroit and all of my family there.  

It's sad really.  


- Original Message 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: list 313 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:44:31 AM
Subject: Re: (313) Business Automotive industry 'If General Motors were to
lose out, I think Detroit would go under

We're not recyclers, he said of his countrymen. We're consumers of
products.
the problem in a nutshell



MEK




Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2008 09:06:49 AM:

 grim reading:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/14/ford-chrysler-general-motors

 m
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.3/1786 - Release Date: 11/14/2008
1:36 PM