Re: [389-devel] [389-users] git repo / tarball issues

[Timo Aaltonen]

On 04.04.2014 20:00, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 10:55 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> On 04.04.2014 19:42, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
>>> Hi Timo,
>>>
>>> Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> 1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for
> release
> in Sep'12
> You can download the tar ball from here now.
> http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2
 Cool, thanks. It's a broken tarball though, you forgot '/' after the
 version..
>>> Sorry.  I've fixed it...  Could you please try it, one more time?
>> Yup, it's fine now.
>>
 Also, you still need some way to fix the process of how these links get
 to the webpage too :)
>>> Yeah, that's what I thought, too.   I searched an existing page on
>>> http://directory.fedoraproject.org, but I could not find it.
>>>
>>> Rich, could there be a good place to put the link(s)?
>> you probably mean this?
>>
>> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Source
> 
> I think Timo (and probably other people who monitor the source tarballs)
> would like to have a URL to a directory containing the sources, rather
> than have to have the URL of the file.  Then we could just push files to
> that directory, and he and others could just monitor that directory for
> new files.

Yeah that's correct, trying to get a directory listing from the current
directory gives an error, so I'm using the wikipage for monitoring new
releases, and it's not working too well as demonstrated :)

so a truly public webdir (or ftp) would be best.


-- 
t
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] [389-users] git repo / tarball issues

[Noriko Hosoi]

Timo Aaltonen wrote:

you probably mean this?

http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Source
Ah, I see.  I haven't updated the page, done just release notes... Let 
me clean it up to adjust the current versions.


Thanks, again!
--noriko
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] [389-users] git repo / tarball issues

[Rich Megginson]

On 04/04/2014 10:55 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:

On 04.04.2014 19:42, Noriko Hosoi wrote:

Hi Timo,

Timo Aaltonen wrote:

1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release
in Sep'12
You can download the tar ball from here now.
http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2

Cool, thanks. It's a broken tarball though, you forgot '/' after the
version..

Sorry.  I've fixed it...  Could you please try it, one more time?

Yup, it's fine now.


Also, you still need some way to fix the process of how these links get
to the webpage too :)

Yeah, that's what I thought, too.   I searched an existing page on
http://directory.fedoraproject.org, but I could not find it.

Rich, could there be a good place to put the link(s)?

you probably mean this?

http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Source


I think Timo (and probably other people who monitor the source tarballs) 
would like to have a URL to a directory containing the sources, rather 
than have to have the URL of the file.  Then we could just push files to 
that directory, and he and others could just monitor that directory for 
new files.





Now I see that you have a separate 389-announce list where only the
stable releases get announced.. maybe send those to 389-users too?

All right.  I will do so from the next time.  Thanks for your suggestion!

great, thanks!




--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] [389-users] git repo / tarball issues

[Timo Aaltonen]

On 04.04.2014 19:42, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> Hi Timo,
> 
> Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>>
>>> 1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release
>>> in Sep'12
>>> You can download the tar ball from here now.
>>> http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2
>> Cool, thanks. It's a broken tarball though, you forgot '/' after the
>> version..
> Sorry.  I've fixed it...  Could you please try it, one more time?

Yup, it's fine now.

>> Also, you still need some way to fix the process of how these links get
>> to the webpage too :)
> Yeah, that's what I thought, too.   I searched an existing page on
> http://directory.fedoraproject.org, but I could not find it.
> 
> Rich, could there be a good place to put the link(s)?

you probably mean this?

http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Source

>> Now I see that you have a separate 389-announce list where only the
>> stable releases get announced.. maybe send those to 389-users too?
> All right.  I will do so from the next time.  Thanks for your suggestion!

great, thanks!


-- 
t
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] [389-users] git repo / tarball issues

[Noriko Hosoi]

Hi Timo,

Timo Aaltonen wrote:



1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release
in Sep'12
You can download the tar ball from here now.
http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2

Cool, thanks. It's a broken tarball though, you forgot '/' after the
version..

Sorry.  I've fixed it...  Could you please try it, one more time?

   tar tvjf 389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2
   drwxrwxr-x root/root 0 2012-09-17 13:03 389-ds-console-1.2.7/
   -rw-rw-r-- root/root35 2012-09-17 13:03
   389-ds-console-1.2.7/.gitignore
   -rw-rw-r-- root/root  4628 2012-09-17 13:03
   389-ds-console-1.2.7/389-ds-console.spec
   -rw-rw-r-- root/root 12279 2012-09-17 13:03
   389-ds-console-1.2.7/LICENSE
   -rwxrwxr-x root/root  1002 2012-09-17 13:03
   389-ds-console-1.2.7/build.properties


Also, you still need some way to fix the process of how these links get
to the webpage too :)
Yeah, that's what I thought, too.   I searched an existing page on 
http://directory.fedoraproject.org, but I could not find it.


Rich, could there be a good place to put the link(s)?

2) 389-adminutil 1.1.20 is not tagged in git

Looks like it is, according to
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/

Rich, I cannot see the tag, either...  *puzzled*

 $ git pull
 Already up-to-date.
 $ git tag -l | egrep 389-adminutil
 389-adminutil-1.1.10
 389-adminutil-1.1.11
 389-adminutil-1.1.12
 389-adminutil-1.1.13
 389-adminutil-1.1.14
 389-adminutil-1.1.15
 389-adminutil-1.1.16
 389-adminutil-1.1.17
 389-adminutil-1.1.18
 389-adminutil-1.1.19
 389-adminutil-1.1.8
 389-adminutil-1.1.9

although indeed this page
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/ shows it is...
Timo, you could download the zip file/tar ball that has the tag from
here.  So, you have no problem to continue your task?

I've used the release tarball and packaging is on 9b3cfced24ffe6e6e from
master, so I'm good.. just wondered why the tag wasn't there but it was.


3) 389-ds-base repo seems to be in limbo, since 1.3.2 branch doesn't
have the latest release, which itself was just 1.3.2.13+ one patch, so
doesn't contain changes from .14 and .15. So which one am I supposed to
push to the distro?

389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 is a security fix only release.  It's branched from
the stable build (1.3.2.13) and it has only the fix.  The tag
389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 tag is on the 389-ds-base-1.3.2-CVE-2014-0132
branch.  Once we finish more testing, we are going back to the normal
branch 389-ds-base-1.3.2.  Sorry about this confusion.

ahh ok, I'll just rebase on .16 then.

Now I see that you have a separate 389-announce list where only the
stable releases get announced.. maybe send those to 389-users too?

All right.  I will do so from the next time.  Thanks for your suggestion!
--noriko
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] [389-users] git repo / tarball issues

[Timo Aaltonen]

On 03.04.2014 21:13, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> (I'm switching from 389-users to 389-devel list for people who could be
> more interested in...)
> 
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> On 04/03/2014 07:06 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>It's me again :)
>>>
>>> 1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release
>>> in Sep'12
> You can download the tar ball from here now.
> http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2

Cool, thanks. It's a broken tarball though, you forgot '/' after the
version..

Also, you still need some way to fix the process of how these links get
to the webpage too :)

>>>
>>> 2) 389-adminutil 1.1.20 is not tagged in git
>>
>> Looks like it is, according to
>> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/
> Rich, I cannot see the tag, either...  *puzzled*
> 
> $ git pull
> Already up-to-date.
> $ git tag -l | egrep 389-adminutil
> 389-adminutil-1.1.10
> 389-adminutil-1.1.11
> 389-adminutil-1.1.12
> 389-adminutil-1.1.13
> 389-adminutil-1.1.14
> 389-adminutil-1.1.15
> 389-adminutil-1.1.16
> 389-adminutil-1.1.17
> 389-adminutil-1.1.18
> 389-adminutil-1.1.19
> 389-adminutil-1.1.8
> 389-adminutil-1.1.9
> 
> although indeed this page
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/ shows it is... 
> Timo, you could download the zip file/tar ball that has the tag from
> here.  So, you have no problem to continue your task?

I've used the release tarball and packaging is on 9b3cfced24ffe6e6e from
master, so I'm good.. just wondered why the tag wasn't there but it was.

>>> 3) 389-ds-base repo seems to be in limbo, since 1.3.2 branch doesn't
>>> have the latest release, which itself was just 1.3.2.13+ one patch, so
>>> doesn't contain changes from .14 and .15. So which one am I supposed to
>>> push to the distro?
> 389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 is a security fix only release.  It's branched from
> the stable build (1.3.2.13) and it has only the fix.  The tag
> 389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 tag is on the 389-ds-base-1.3.2-CVE-2014-0132
> branch.  Once we finish more testing, we are going back to the normal
> branch 389-ds-base-1.3.2.  Sorry about this confusion.

ahh ok, I'll just rebase on .16 then.

Now I see that you have a separate 389-announce list where only the
stable releases get announced.. maybe send those to 389-users too?


-- 
t
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: [389-devel] [389-users] git repo / tarball issues

[Noriko Hosoi]

Hello,

(I'm switching from 389-users to 389-devel list for people who could be 
more interested in...)


Rich Megginson wrote:

On 04/03/2014 07:06 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:

Hi

   It's me again :)

1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release
in Sep'12

You can download the tar ball from here now.
http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2


2) 389-adminutil 1.1.20 is not tagged in git


Looks like it is, according to 
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/

Rich, I cannot see the tag, either...  *puzzled*

   $ git pull
   Already up-to-date.
   $ git tag -l | egrep 389-adminutil
   389-adminutil-1.1.10
   389-adminutil-1.1.11
   389-adminutil-1.1.12
   389-adminutil-1.1.13
   389-adminutil-1.1.14
   389-adminutil-1.1.15
   389-adminutil-1.1.16
   389-adminutil-1.1.17
   389-adminutil-1.1.18
   389-adminutil-1.1.19
   389-adminutil-1.1.8
   389-adminutil-1.1.9

although indeed this page 
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/ shows it is... 
Timo, you could download the zip file/tar ball that has the tag from 
here.  So, you have no problem to continue your task?


   Tag  Download
   389-adminutil-1.1.20
   

adminutil-389-adminutil-1.1.20.zip
   

   adminutil-389-adminutil-1.1.20.tar.gz
   

   adminutil-389-adminutil-1.1.20.tar.xz
   








3) 389-ds-base repo seems to be in limbo, since 1.3.2 branch doesn't
have the latest release, which itself was just 1.3.2.13+ one patch, so
doesn't contain changes from .14 and .15. So which one am I supposed to
push to the distro?
389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 is a security fix only release.  It's branched from 
the stable build (1.3.2.13) and it has only the fix.  The tag 
389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 tag is on the 389-ds-base-1.3.2-CVE-2014-0132 
branch.  Once we finish more testing, we are going back to the normal 
branch 389-ds-base-1.3.2.  Sorry about this confusion.

Thanks,
--noriko
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel