Hi all,
I also support the WG adoption of draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 for
the same reason highlighted by Alex.
Regards, Marco Carugi - AIOTI (Alliance for IoT Innovation) WG
Standardization expert
Le jeu. 4 août 2022 à 11:54, Galis, Alex a écrit :
> 4th August 2022
>
> Hi All
>
> I support the adoption call for draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 as it
> would enable IP networks to utilize fewer resources from constrained nodes.
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Alex Galis
>
> On 4 Aug 2022, at 09:52, Luigi IANNONE <
> luigi.iannone=40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> ⚠ Caution: External sender
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to join Li Guangpeng in thanking Pascal. His great feedback
> made the document much better and the solution more robust.
> As for the comments in the last mail, they look more subjective than
> technically objective.
>
> As a co-authors I support adoption.
>
> Ciao
>
> L.
>
>
>
> *From:* 6lo <6lo-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Liguangpeng (Roc,
> Network Technology Laboratory)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 3 August 2022 09:01
> *To:* Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
> *Cc:* Carles Gomez Montenegro ; 6lo <6lo@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [6lo] Call for WG adoption of
> draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03
>
> Hi Pascal and all,
>
> As we know, the discussion of whether routing in LLN networks should run
> at Layer 2 or Layer 3 (network layer) has become a very sensitive issue for
> a long time. With the advent of multiple low-power link layer
> technologies, such as IEEE 802.15.4, Wi-Fi, and PLC, network layer routing
> is clearly required. However, the separation of mesh-under and route-over
> processes induces suboptimal routes and (L2 and L3) duplicated re-route
> overhead.
>
> This draft’s topological addressing method can integrate address and route
> information into a single place. It will help to run IP layer on various
> link layer technologies and meanwhile avoid above duplicated re-route
> issues.
>
> Thanks Pascal for continuous advices and comments. As author of this
> draft, I want to state support of this adoption.
>
> Regards,
> Guangpeng Li
>
> *From:* 6lo <6lo-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Pascal Thubert
> (pthubert)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 3, 2022 12:37 PM
> *To:* Jing Wang
> *Cc:* Carles Gomez Montenegro ; 6lo <6lo@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [6lo] Call for WG adoption of
> draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03
>
> Hello Carles
>
> I have reviewed the work carefully.
>
> I believe that we can achieve short packets with 6lo and SCHC so that
> piece is not an essential progress. So 6lo as an INT areaWg does not need
> it.The essential progress is meshing without routing. It’s probably hard
> to justify it at the routing area though the authors could try.
>
> My feeling is that the idea is interesting but has a very narrow
> applicability, which is in essence the opposite of IP. The progress applies
> only to very specific L2 networks. This tells me that it is really an L2
> technology and should be used for MAC not IP.
>
> Bottom line is that I do not believe that the work belongs to the IETF. I
> do not support adoption at 6lo.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> Le 2 août 2022 à 18:01, Jing Wang a écrit :
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
> I support the adoption call. In my opinion, this can help enlarge
> scope of IP network, considering it may consume less resource of
> constrained nodes.
>
> BR,
> Jing Wang
>
>
> *From:* Carles Gomez Montenegro
> *Date:* 2022-08-01 22:58
> *To:* 6lo <6lo@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [6lo] Call for WG adoption of
> draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03
> Dear 6lo WG,
>
> This message starts a call for WG adoption for
> draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03.
>
> (Link below:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03
> )
>
> Considering that some folks may be on vacation currently or in the next
> few days, the call will end on the 22nd of August, EOB.
>
> Please state whether you are in favor of adopting this document.
>
> Also, any comments you may have, and/or expressions of interest to review
> the document, will be very much appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shwetha and Carles
>
> ___
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
> ___
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
> ___
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
>
> ___
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
___
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
