Re: [9fans] Chrome and 9
I choose - Waste of time Too many hardware versions ( http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/developer-information-for-chrome-os-devices ) And, how about vendor-locks (Google :) )? 2014-12-08 2:59 GMT+03:00 da Tyga cyberfo...@gmail.com: I think that Plan9Port using the underlying Linux OS might be a better choice. I have also been thinking about cross-compiling from a Plan9 install (such as that on Raspberry Pi) to Samsung ARM based ChromeBook. Getting Plan9 to work with fastboot and implementing device drivers for the various ChromeBooks might be a lot of work. Don't know enough to justify my assumptions though. On 8 December 2014 at 06:35, Roswell Grey orangecal...@gmail.com wrote: It's no question that the Chromebook makes a wonderful candidate to integrate features of 9 into. The thing was practically BUILT for distributed computing, what with app servers and cloud integration tightly integrated into the hardware. What I was thinking was creating a chrome extension for 9P and the distributed file system, so that there'd be an easy way to connect 9 machines and maybe even create a chrome 9 grid for super processing. What would be your opinion on doing such a thing? Practical? Waste of time? Wanna help? -- С наилучшими пожеланиями Жилкин Сергей With best regards Zhilkin Sergey
[9fans] Chrome and 9
It's no question that the Chromebook makes a wonderful candidate to integrate features of 9 into. The thing was practically BUILT for distributed computing, what with app servers and cloud integration tightly integrated into the hardware. What I was thinking was creating a chrome extension for 9P and the distributed file system, so that there'd be an easy way to connect 9 machines and maybe even create a chrome 9 grid for super processing. What would be your opinion on doing such a thing? Practical? Waste of time? Wanna help?
Re: [9fans] Chrome and 9
I think that Plan9Port using the underlying Linux OS might be a better choice. I have also been thinking about cross-compiling from a Plan9 install (such as that on Raspberry Pi) to Samsung ARM based ChromeBook. Getting Plan9 to work with fastboot and implementing device drivers for the various ChromeBooks might be a lot of work. Don't know enough to justify my assumptions though. On 8 December 2014 at 06:35, Roswell Grey orangecal...@gmail.com wrote: It's no question that the Chromebook makes a wonderful candidate to integrate features of 9 into. The thing was practically BUILT for distributed computing, what with app servers and cloud integration tightly integrated into the hardware. What I was thinking was creating a chrome extension for 9P and the distributed file system, so that there'd be an easy way to connect 9 machines and maybe even create a chrome 9 grid for super processing. What would be your opinion on doing such a thing? Practical? Waste of time? Wanna help?
