Re: [9fans] Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable
>From: hiro >Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:22 PM >To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs > >no Can you elaborate? Cull
Re: [9fans] Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable
no On 4/3/19, Cull wrote: >>Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 10:08 AM >>>On April 3, 2019 4:02:49 PM UTC, o...@eigenstate.org wrote: >>>Don't particularly care. At some point I'd like to commit it to 9front, >>>but I can relicense it then. >>> >>>Do you have a preference? >> >>Probably MIT or a BSD. >> >>But I can also live with any copyleft of your choice. > > Wouldn't BSD (2 clause) be the easiest to reliscence down the road? > > >
Re: [9fans] Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable
>From: Kurt H Maier >Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 11:59 AM >To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs > >The copyright holder can relicense at will. I guess I was thinking moreso if, for some reason, the author didn't (i.e. went MIA or was just lazy). Cull
Re: [9fans] Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:43:55AM -0700, Cull wrote: > > Wouldn't BSD (2 clause) be the easiest to reliscence down the road? > The copyright holder can relicense at will. khm
[9fans] Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable
>Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 10:08 AM >>On April 3, 2019 4:02:49 PM UTC, o...@eigenstate.org wrote: >>Don't particularly care. At some point I'd like to commit it to 9front, >>but I can relicense it then. >> >>Do you have a preference? > >Probably MIT or a BSD. > >But I can also live with any copyleft of your choice. Wouldn't BSD (2 clause) be the easiest to reliscence down the road?
