Re: [9fans] htmlroff -ms footnotes

2023-10-06 Thread umbraticus 
okay, yeah, .SH calls .RT calls .BG calls .rn FJ FS

you could drop -ms but you probably don't want that either...

you could use ms2html :)

you could write your own macros :)))

umbraticus

--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T530822947a31ba06-Mbe3ae7b1d9fa62fcf9a2f264
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Re: [9fans] htmlroff -ms footnotes

2023-10-06 Thread umbraticus 
It isn't the Abstract, it's the .SH, which calls .RT, which somehow changes
the FS macro. If you replace .SH with .RT in test.ms nothing changes; if you
delete it altogether the missing footnotes appear.

If you put .pm above and below .SH (or .RT) and run:

 ; htmlroff -ms -mhtml test.ms >/dev/null |[2] grep FS

you can see that the FS macro is being messed with. I'll dig further...

umbraticus

--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T530822947a31ba06-M34d92b1177885d8baf1d0ab6
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Re: [9fans] htmlroff -ms footnotes

2023-10-06 Thread a 
see test.(html|ms) in http://a.9srv.net/htmlroff/

--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T530822947a31ba06-M95035f63cbfc822d50ac389a
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Re: [9fans] htmlroff -ms footnotes

2023-10-06 Thread ori 
Quoth a...@9srv.net:
> Working on a little one-page report, I noticed htmlroff wasn't
> outputing my footnotes. Looking at the papers in /sys/doc, it
> seems htmlroff produces them properly when they're in the
> abstract, but not in the main body.
> 
> Anybody looked at this or know why?

no, but do you have an example to reproduce it?


--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T530822947a31ba06-M99ab62c023197f18c8a955a9
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

[9fans] htmlroff -ms footnotes

2023-10-06 Thread a 
Working on a little one-page report, I noticed htmlroff wasn't
outputing my footnotes. Looking at the papers in /sys/doc, it
seems htmlroff produces them properly when they're in the
abstract, but not in the main body.

Anybody looked at this or know why?

--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T530822947a31ba06-Mc2fbfb757158b114260d99ac
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription