Re: [AI] UGC Net
I too surprised by the news. The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] issue certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having minimum eligibility are cleared lectureship. - Original Message - From: "SC Vashishth" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh wrote: I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result. When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should be declared successful. She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of June 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law. The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not responded properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In Kerala, the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC notification, as the number of candidates were much more. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/nagpur/36216041_1
Re: [AI] Issues related to IBPS
thank u sir :) with regards, Kichu Balan - Original Message - From: "Himanshu Sahu" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:36 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Issues related to IBPS Their corrospondence to candidates including you suggest the same! No need of carrying original certificates of scribes... On 1/8/13, Kichu Balan wrote: Sir, I have a doubt. Can I carry the attested copy of certificate of my scribe along with his course certificate & attend the interview? Wont they ask for the originals? regards, Kichu Balan - Original Message - From: "Prashant Naik" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 1:23 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Issues related to IBPS Dear list,One more confirmation from IBPS through a hard copy letter to NAB India employment department in reply to NAB India�s letter dated 07/01/2013 putting the case across to IBPS of unfair conditions for PO interviews. A letter from Shri M V Desai, General Manager (Administration), IBPS mentions following text �The issue has been brought to our notice. The candidates may appear for the interview at the identified centre, date and time. Candidates have also been suitably advised from our end.�Mrs Pallavi Kadam, Director, NAB Employment department also put her pressure on IBPS as she knows IBPS officials very well. We appreciated that pressure from various people and organizations helped to solve this issue in such a short time. Regards,PRASHANT NAIK On 1/7/13, MUTHU Selvi wrote: Friends, With reference to the ongoing discussion regarding unfair conditions of IBPS, I wish to share with you that today AICB took strong action about this matter. Our Vice President, Dr. Anil Aneja has sent a strong fax communication to the Director, IBPS asking him to withdraw the conditions of submission of the Qualification certificate of the scribes in original and a medical certificate on prescribed Performa. He has firmly asserted that such conditions are discriminatory and a violation of the procedures as also of the PWD Act. Further, Dr. Aneja has spoken to the Chief Commissioner For Persons with Disabilities and has also filed a case against IBPS. The CCPD has been very positive and has promised to send a fax to IBPS giving appropriate directions. Hopefully, the issue will be finally resolved. With best. M. Muthu Selvi, Secretary, All India Confederation of the Blind. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- Thanks and regards Himanshu Sahu Reach: 09051055000 Skype: himanshu.cute4u Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/
Re: [AI] UGC Net
I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh wrote: > I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by > training myself. > Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the > cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in > favor of candidates. > So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar > ruling for all candidates? > Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates > automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. > Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is > a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a > provision is affecting many persons. > PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. > > > From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] > On Behalf Of Prashanth > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM > To: AccessIndia > Cc: World Opinion Google's group: > Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants > Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: > > Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST > > NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire > from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on > the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test > (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari > granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide > its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if > UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC > officials to be present at the next hearing. > > The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth > resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing > minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The > test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects > for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). > > Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti > Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in > the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to > score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the > criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was > never communicated till the declaration of the result. > > When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared > failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had > fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have > scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them > individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should be > declared successful. > > She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of June > 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general > category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law. > > The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of > candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not responded > properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In Kerala, > the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC notification, > as the number of candidates were much more. > > > > http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/nagpur/36216041_1_ugc-notification-ugc-officials-three-papers > > > With thanks and regards > > > > (Rajesh Asudani) > Assistant General Manager > Reserve Bank of India > Nagpur > Cell: 9420397185 > o: +91 712 2806846 > R: 2591349 > > (In
Re: [AI] Eyeway alerts
Hi Rohiet, I just checked the Google SMS channel and it still shows the following message: "SMS Channels are temporarily paused due to rise in bulk SMS costs. We apologize for the inconvenience." Satguru ___,__.___ "Life's battle do not always go, to the stronger or faster man. But sooner or later the one who wins, is the one who thinks he can." Satguru Rathi. Mobile: +91-9871489945 Email: satgurura...@yahoo.co.in satgurura...@ovi.com Skype: satgururathi Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/satguru.rathi.9 - Original Message - From: "Rohiet A. Patil" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Eyeway alerts Hi! It seems that google SMS service has been resume now. Because today morning, I got a SMS from nab india sms channel call "nab recruitment " regarding on going IBPS issue. So I kindly request to please give it a tri so that our non internet user also can be benifited. Regards, -Original Message- From: Eyeway Helpdesk Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:58 PM To: Access India ; Retina India Subject: [AI] Eyeway alerts Hi all, Today's Eyeway alerts are: 1. 2 posts for VI (1 for SC and 1 for UR) as Assistant Professor in various departments in Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur(Rajasthan). Essential qualifications: M.Tech and Ph.D . Last date 28th January. Apply online. More at www.eyeway.org/includes/classifieds/jobs 2. Common Written Examination by IBPS for Recruitment of Specialist Officers in 19 Public Sector Banks. Last date 21st January. For fee 20th January. Apply online. Application Fee is Rs. 20/-. More at www.eyeway.org/includes/classifieds/jobs With best regards, Helpdesk team Project Eyeway - A knowledge resource for living a fuller life with vision loss C/o Score Foundation, 17/107 L.G.F., Vikram Vihar, Lajpat Nagar - 4, New Delhi - 110024. India. Helpdesk:+91-11-460 70 380 (Monday to Friday 10am to 5pm) Website: www.eyeway.org. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
[AI] UGC Net
I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result. When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should be declared successful. She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of June 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law. The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not responded properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In Kerala, the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC notification, as the number of candidates were much more. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/nagpur/36216041_1_ugc-notification-ugc-officials-three-papers With thanks and regards (Rajesh Asudani) Assistant General Manager Reserve Bank of India Nagpur Cell: 9420397185 o: +91 712 2806846 R: 2591349 (In youth you want things, and then in middle-age you want to want them.) Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, smses or makes calls asking for personal information like your bank account details, passwords, etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in any manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look. Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Se
Re: [AI] daemon tools lite
it is quite accessible. Umesha - Original Message - From: "Siddhi Desai" To: Sent: Tuesday, 08 January, 2013 3:29 PM Subject: [AI] daemon tools lite Hi Guys, I am trying to use daemon tools lite software. Does anybody have an idea how much it is accessible? thanks in advanced! Regards Siddhi Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] INSTRUCTIONS NEDED TO INSTALL SKYPE SCRIPTS
Respected sir, you need b b script. With regards from Inamuddin with the skype id: charlsdarwin1 - Original Message - From: "shankar shan" To: "accessindia" Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:54 PM Subject: [AI] INSTRUCTIONS NEDED TO INSTALL SKYPE SCRIPTS DEAR ALL, GREETINGS, I am using jaws13 64 bit, windows7 with dell laptop when I parchased the lap for the 1st timeI installed skype scripts well but I was trying to do some resurch on the jaws after that I am not able to install the scripts now the problem is when ever I tried to installing skype scripts I am getting the error the error is pasted below Install into JAWS folders 13.0. Preparing for JAWS script compilation. 13.0: User folder: C:\Users\shanker\AppData\Roaming\Freedom Scientific\JAWS\13.0\Settings\enu Shared folder: C:\ProgramData\Freedom Scientific\JAWS\13.0\Settings\enu Output folder: C:\Users\shanker\AppData\Roaming\Freedom Scientific\JAWS\13.0\Settings\enu Installing files. JAWSUtil command: compile skype_compat.jss skype_jcpdict.jss Skype.JSS skypewatch.JSS Command returned 1. Output: CScript Error: Can't find script engine "VBScript" for script "C:\Users\shanker\AppData\Local\Temp\nseCC26.tmp\jawsutil.vbs". End of output. Restoring this JAWS folder to its original state. JAWSUtil command: chain "default" remove skypewatch.jsb Command returned 1. Output: CScript Error: Can't find script engine "VBScript" for script "C:\Users\shanker\AppData\Local\Temp\nseCC26.tmp\jawsutil.vbs". End of output. JAWSInstallDirs is . All installations failed! Writing log file. please help me to get ridof from this problem -- For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life Email: harshalgip...@gmail.com Msn: harshalgip...@hotmail.com Skype: shankar.a mobile:+91 9986391143 **Technical Consultant** Thanks and Regards Shankar!!! Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
[AI] High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria:
Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result. When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should be declared successful. She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of June 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law. The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not responded properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In Kerala, the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC notification, as the number of candidates were much more. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/nagpur/36216041_1_ugc-notification-ugc-officials-three-papers Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] Eyeway alerts
Hi! It seems that google SMS service has been resume now. Because today morning, I got a SMS from nab india sms channel call "nab recruitment " regarding on going IBPS issue. So I kindly request to please give it a tri so that our non internet user also can be benifited. Regards, -Original Message- From: Eyeway Helpdesk Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:58 PM To: Access India ; Retina India Subject: [AI] Eyeway alerts Hi all, Today's Eyeway alerts are: 1. 2 posts for VI (1 for SC and 1 for UR) as Assistant Professor in various departments in Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur(Rajasthan). Essential qualifications: M.Tech and Ph.D . Last date 28th January. Apply online. More at www.eyeway.org/includes/classifieds/jobs 2. Common Written Examination by IBPS for Recruitment of Specialist Officers in 19 Public Sector Banks. Last date 21st January. For fee 20th January. Apply online. Application Fee is Rs. 20/-. More at www.eyeway.org/includes/classifieds/jobs With best regards, Helpdesk team Project Eyeway - A knowledge resource for living a fuller life with vision loss C/o Score Foundation, 17/107 L.G.F., Vikram Vihar, Lajpat Nagar - 4, New Delhi - 110024. India. Helpdesk:+91-11-460 70 380 (Monday to Friday 10am to 5pm) Website: www.eyeway.org. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] Facebook accessibility
You could try using: m.facebook.com It works well.. Cheers. Heeru --- On Fri, 14/12/12, akhilesh wrote: From: akhilesh Subject: Re: [AI] Facebook accessibility To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Date: Friday, 14 December, 2012, 12:24 AM Hi Surendra, I'm underlining some of the features which are available in main facebook page i.e. facebook.com 1. You can mention a person in your comments or status from your friend list. Please note: mentioning includes name with profile link and photo. 2. you can update your status with a link of your location.\ 3. facility of commenting in the same page is available only in computer version. there are many other issues, but it is not the matters of facilities only, but accessibility also! On 12/13/12, Master wrote: > hello friends! i reed many mails about facebook exessibility page. is it > > a new version of facebook? i am unable to understand. please tell me briefly > > about this if somebody knows. > with worm regards > Dinesh Mittal > > - Original Message - > From: "akhilesh" > To: > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:26 AM > Subject: [AI] Facebook accessibility > > >> Hi all, >> Today saw a mail on accessindia dedicated to accessibility facebook page. >> Special Accessibility page and still inaccessible!!! >> >> I'm facing dificulty updating status on: >> facebook.com >> However, >> m.facebook.com is working fine. >> >> So, are we forced to use the mobile version only? or I am the only one >> facing this strange issue. >> >> There are many features which are not available on Mobile version, so >> please don't advise to stick with mobile version only. >> >> replies awaited. >> >> -- >> Akhilesh Dahiya, >> Advocate. >> Mobile: +91 9818798780 >> Email: akhil.akhi...@gmail.com >> New Delhi >> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of >> >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > -- Akhilesh Dahiya, Advocate. Mobile: +91 9818798780 Email: akhil.akhi...@gmail.com New Delhi Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
[AI] Eyeway alerts
Hi all, Today's Eyeway alerts are: 1. 2 posts for VI (1 for SC and 1 for UR) as Assistant Professor in various departments in Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur(Rajasthan). Essential qualifications: M.Tech and Ph.D . Last date 28th January. Apply online. More at www.eyeway.org/includes/classifieds/jobs 2. Common Written Examination by IBPS for Recruitment of Specialist Officers in 19 Public Sector Banks. Last date 21st January. For fee 20th January. Apply online. Application Fee is Rs. 20/-. More at www.eyeway.org/includes/classifieds/jobs With best regards, Helpdesk team Project Eyeway - A knowledge resource for living a fuller life with vision loss C/o Score Foundation, 17/107 L.G.F., Vikram Vihar, Lajpat Nagar - 4, New Delhi - 110024. India. Helpdesk:+91-11-460 70 380 (Monday to Friday 10am to 5pm) Website: www.eyeway.org. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] I am not getting mails in my Nokia C5.
hi,please chek with gmail on the web,go to settings from there please check your imap settings is unable or not.for more please call me 09702559821 On 1/9/13, jaison bellarmine wrote: > Hai friends, > I had sent the mail about the issue from my phone once. But I am not > sure whether it reached the list and so I am sending it again. 3days > ago the mails from the inbox of the mail box was removed > automatically and since then I am not getting any mail in my mail box > of my C5 phone. I removed the mail box and created the same again. But > the result is the same. I am from Kerala and I am using BSNL network. > My net acount is active and I am able to use internet on my phone. > Please help me to solve the problem. > > with thanks & regards > Jaison Bellarmine > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > -- friends always follow one thought,dont give up!just go on..salim a qureshi.(CPT).consulting physio therapist,mobile no+919702559821,e-mail salim2...@gmail.com salim_phy...@hotmail.com facebook http://www.facebook.com/sq2104 twitter http://www.twitter.com/sq2104 skyep physiosalim Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] Issues related to IBPS
Their corrospondence to candidates including you suggest the same! No need of carrying original certificates of scribes... On 1/8/13, Kichu Balan wrote: > Sir, I have a doubt. Can I carry the attested copy of certificate of my > scribe along with his course certificate & attend the interview? Wont they > ask for the originals? > > > > regards, > > Kichu Balan > > - Original Message - > From: "Prashant Naik" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 1:23 PM > Subject: Re: [AI] Issues related to IBPS > > >> Dear list,One more confirmation from IBPS through a hard copy letter >> to NAB India employment department in reply to NAB India�s letter >> dated 07/01/2013 putting the case across to IBPS of unfair conditions >> for PO interviews. A letter from Shri M V Desai, General Manager >> (Administration), IBPS mentions following text �The issue has been >> brought to our notice. The candidates may appear for the interview at >> the identified centre, date and time. Candidates have also been >> suitably advised from our end.�Mrs Pallavi Kadam, Director, NAB >> Employment department also put her pressure on IBPS as she knows IBPS >> officials very well. We appreciated that pressure from various >> people and organizations helped to solve this issue in such a short >> time. Regards,PRASHANT NAIK >> >> On 1/7/13, MUTHU Selvi wrote: >>> Friends, >>> >>> With reference to the ongoing discussion regarding unfair conditions >>> of IBPS, I wish to share with you that today AICB took strong action >>> about this matter. Our Vice President, Dr. Anil Aneja has sent a >>> strong fax communication to the Director, IBPS asking him to withdraw >>> the conditions of submission of the Qualification certificate of the >>> scribes in original and a medical certificate on prescribed Performa. >>> He has firmly asserted that such conditions are discriminatory and a >>> violation of the procedures as also of the PWD Act. Further, Dr. Aneja >>> has spoken to the Chief Commissioner For Persons with Disabilities and >>> has also filed a case against IBPS. The CCPD has been very positive >>> and has promised to send a fax to IBPS giving appropriate >>> directions. Hopefully, the issue will be finally resolved. >>> >>> >>> >>> With best. >>> >>> >>> >>> M. Muthu Selvi, >>> >>> Secretary, All India Confederation of the Blind. >>> >>> >>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >>> of >>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >>> Search for old postings at: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >>> >>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>> >>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>> please >>> visit the list home page at >>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >> >> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of >> >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> > > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > -- Thanks and regards Himanshu Sahu Reach: 09051055000 Skype: himanshu.cute4u Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
