Re: [AI] (AI) Bombay High court recalls order, allows FTII to reject colour blind student for editing course
The disability is a disability till a human or a suitable technology is not there to mitigate it. For example we the blind could not read print till someone or jaws did it for us. So, let us accept. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Sandeep Singh Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 7:37 PM To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] (AI) Bombay High court recalls order, allows FTII to reject colour blind student for editing course Hi, I really don't know the extent of disability color blindness is considered, but perceiving colors wrongly may cause problems while editing I guess. As far as I know, color blind persons are not issued driving licenses as they cannot differentiate between red and green lights on a traffic signal. Experts may throw more light on the subject. Regards, Sandeep On 2/15/17, Kotian, H P <hpkot...@rbi.org.in> wrote: > Hi > Something to ponder: can a colour blind person be treated as blind? What > percentage of disability can be attributed to him? > > Experts may throw some colour to this question? > Harish. > > > -Original Message- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of turab chimthanawala > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 4:32 PM > To: accessindia <accessindia@accessindia.org.in> > Subject: [AI] (AI) Bombay High court recalls order, allows FTII to reject > colour blind student for editing course > > Reported in the Times of India dated 6th February 2017 > > In a setback to a colour blind youth, Bombay high court recalled its order > directing Film and Television Institute of India to grant him provisional > admission to the film editing course. > A bench of Justices Shantanu Khemkar and Prakash Naik took note of FTII's > submission that since the first semester was over, and also its examination, > it was not possible to accommodate Patna-based Ashutosh Kumar directly into > the second semester which had started. The court's order came on a review > petition filed by FTII, which urged the court to recall its January 18 order > to admit Ashutosh to the three-year post-graduate diploma course. > Ashutosh applied to FTII and appeared for an exam in April 2015. When the > results were out in June 2016, he was selected. When he reported in July for > orientation, he was told to do a medical examination, which revealed he was > suffering from colour blindness and low vision. > A report from the Pune government hospital said his colour vision was > partially defective. FTII then wrote to Ashutosh that he was not eligible > for the course and why candidates suffering from colour blindness were > unsuitable for editing. His petition said under Right to Information, he > learnt from Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute that it does not > discriminate against candidates with colour blindness or partial defect. > After he got relief from HC, FTII moved a review petition. Its petition > stated that if colour blind persons edited films it would lead to a loss of > crores of rupees for producers. > Ashutosh's advocate argued that FTII's stand that the first semester was > over was known at the time of the January 18 order and no case was made out > for its review. But the judges found merit in FTII's submission. "It is open > for the petitioner to apply for admission of the first semester of the next > year without prejudice to his contentions raised in the petition,'' they > said in the February 1 order. > > Ashutoshs' petition had urged the court to declare that part of FTII's > prospectus disallowing persons with colour blindness from pursuing the > film-editing course as violative of the Right to Equality and Right to Life. > The court has posted the next hearing on February 21. > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > >
Re: [AI] (AI) Bombay High court recalls order, allows FTII to reject colour blind student for editing course
Hi, I really don't know the extent of disability color blindness is considered, but perceiving colors wrongly may cause problems while editing I guess. As far as I know, color blind persons are not issued driving licenses as they cannot differentiate between red and green lights on a traffic signal. Experts may throw more light on the subject. Regards, Sandeep On 2/15/17, Kotian, H P <hpkot...@rbi.org.in> wrote: > Hi > Something to ponder: can a colour blind person be treated as blind? What > percentage of disability can be attributed to him? > > Experts may throw some colour to this question? > Harish. > > > -Original Message- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of turab chimthanawala > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 4:32 PM > To: accessindia <accessindia@accessindia.org.in> > Subject: [AI] (AI) Bombay High court recalls order, allows FTII to reject > colour blind student for editing course > > Reported in the Times of India dated 6th February 2017 > > In a setback to a colour blind youth, Bombay high court recalled its order > directing Film and Television Institute of India to grant him provisional > admission to the film editing course. > A bench of Justices Shantanu Khemkar and Prakash Naik took note of FTII's > submission that since the first semester was over, and also its examination, > it was not possible to accommodate Patna-based Ashutosh Kumar directly into > the second semester which had started. The court's order came on a review > petition filed by FTII, which urged the court to recall its January 18 order > to admit Ashutosh to the three-year post-graduate diploma course. > Ashutosh applied to FTII and appeared for an exam in April 2015. When the > results were out in June 2016, he was selected. When he reported in July for > orientation, he was told to do a medical examination, which revealed he was > suffering from colour blindness and low vision. > A report from the Pune government hospital said his colour vision was > partially defective. FTII then wrote to Ashutosh that he was not eligible > for the course and why candidates suffering from colour blindness were > unsuitable for editing. His petition said under Right to Information, he > learnt from Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute that it does not > discriminate against candidates with colour blindness or partial defect. > After he got relief from HC, FTII moved a review petition. Its petition > stated that if colour blind persons edited films it would lead to a loss of > crores of rupees for producers. > Ashutosh's advocate argued that FTII's stand that the first semester was > over was known at the time of the January 18 order and no case was made out > for its review. But the judges found merit in FTII's submission. "It is open > for the petitioner to apply for admission of the first semester of the next > year without prejudice to his contentions raised in the petition,'' they > said in the February 1 order. > > Ashutoshs' petition had urged the court to declare that part of FTII's > prospectus disallowing persons with colour blindness from pursuing the > film-editing course as violative of the Right to Equality and Right to Life. > The court has posted the next hearing on February 21. > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > > > > Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, SMSs or makes calls > asking for personal information such as your bank account details, > passwords, etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not > respond in any manner to such offers, however official or attractive they > may look. > > > Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. If you are not the intended recipie
Re: [AI] (AI) Bombay High court recalls order, allows FTII to reject colour blind student for editing course
Hi Something to ponder: can a colour blind person be treated as blind? What percentage of disability can be attributed to him? Experts may throw some colour to this question? Harish. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of turab chimthanawala Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 4:32 PM To: accessindia <accessindia@accessindia.org.in> Subject: [AI] (AI) Bombay High court recalls order, allows FTII to reject colour blind student for editing course Reported in the Times of India dated 6th February 2017 In a setback to a colour blind youth, Bombay high court recalled its order directing Film and Television Institute of India to grant him provisional admission to the film editing course. A bench of Justices Shantanu Khemkar and Prakash Naik took note of FTII's submission that since the first semester was over, and also its examination, it was not possible to accommodate Patna-based Ashutosh Kumar directly into the second semester which had started. The court's order came on a review petition filed by FTII, which urged the court to recall its January 18 order to admit Ashutosh to the three-year post-graduate diploma course. Ashutosh applied to FTII and appeared for an exam in April 2015. When the results were out in June 2016, he was selected. When he reported in July for orientation, he was told to do a medical examination, which revealed he was suffering from colour blindness and low vision. A report from the Pune government hospital said his colour vision was partially defective. FTII then wrote to Ashutosh that he was not eligible for the course and why candidates suffering from colour blindness were unsuitable for editing. His petition said under Right to Information, he learnt from Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute that it does not discriminate against candidates with colour blindness or partial defect. After he got relief from HC, FTII moved a review petition. Its petition stated that if colour blind persons edited films it would lead to a loss of crores of rupees for producers. Ashutosh's advocate argued that FTII's stand that the first semester was over was known at the time of the January 18 order and no case was made out for its review. But the judges found merit in FTII's submission. "It is open for the petitioner to apply for admission of the first semester of the next year without prejudice to his contentions raised in the petition,'' they said in the February 1 order. Ashutoshs' petition had urged the court to declare that part of FTII's prospectus disallowing persons with colour blindness from pursuing the film-editing course as violative of the Right to Equality and Right to Life. The court has posted the next hearing on February 21. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, SMSs or makes calls asking for personal information such as your bank account details, passwords, etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in any manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look. Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessi
[AI] (AI) Bombay High court recalls order, allows FTII to reject colour blind student for editing course
Reported in the Times of India dated 6th February 2017 In a setback to a colour blind youth, Bombay high court recalled its order directing Film and Television Institute of India to grant him provisional admission to the film editing course. A bench of Justices Shantanu Khemkar and Prakash Naik took note of FTII's submission that since the first semester was over, and also its examination, it was not possible to accommodate Patna-based Ashutosh Kumar directly into the second semester which had started. The court's order came on a review petition filed by FTII, which urged the court to recall its January 18 order to admit Ashutosh to the three-year post-graduate diploma course. Ashutosh applied to FTII and appeared for an exam in April 2015. When the results were out in June 2016, he was selected. When he reported in July for orientation, he was told to do a medical examination, which revealed he was suffering from colour blindness and low vision. A report from the Pune government hospital said his colour vision was partially defective. FTII then wrote to Ashutosh that he was not eligible for the course and why candidates suffering from colour blindness were unsuitable for editing. His petition said under Right to Information, he learnt from Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute that it does not discriminate against candidates with colour blindness or partial defect. After he got relief from HC, FTII moved a review petition. Its petition stated that if colour blind persons edited films it would lead to a loss of crores of rupees for producers. Ashutosh's advocate argued that FTII's stand that the first semester was over was known at the time of the January 18 order and no case was made out for its review. But the judges found merit in FTII's submission. "It is open for the petitioner to apply for admission of the first semester of the next year without prejudice to his contentions raised in the petition,'' they said in the February 1 order. Ashutoshs' petition had urged the court to declare that part of FTII's prospectus disallowing persons with colour blindness from pursuing the film-editing course as violative of the Right to Equality and Right to Life. The court has posted the next hearing on February 21. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
