On Feb 18, 2018, at 08:35, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> We should maybe add that this information is provisioned either during 
> manufacturing, via a commissioning tool or some other mechanisms. Not sure 
> whether this will indeed add more but it might be useful to know.

For a protocol that is meant to be interoperable, there need to be standard (if 
not MTI) ways of getting this done.
At least we need to have a defined interface between CAM (“commissioning tool”) 
and C for letting C know what was agreed about how to address AS and which RSes 
it should be used for.

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Reply via email to