Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] .classpath file in Subversion
BTW there is a new Eclipse plugin for Maven that can import maven projects directly and keep the classpath synced from the pom http://code.google.com/p/q4e/ Disclaimer: I work on the project On 9/10/07, Ray Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why isn't it? > > If you're only interested in working on core then... > cd core > mvn eclipse:eclipse > > > > On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Executing mvn eclipse:eclipse creates projects for each of the modules, > > which is probably not what we want. > > > > -Scott > > > > Ray Krueger wrote: > > > I think the .classpath files should be removed. They are doomed to be > > > stale. > > > The project is now built with maven2 completely. Maven can create the > > > .classpath files as needed. > > > > > > Executing "mvn eclipse:eclipse" from the project root will create > > > everything needed. > > > > > > > > > On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> I'm doing some work on some of the JIRA issues assigned to me (finally > > >> getting a chance) and I checked out the project and noticed that the > > >> .classpath was referring to Spring 1.2.9 while the pom refers to 2.0.6. > > >> Anyone have any issues if I update the .classpath file to reflect the > > >> latest Spring version? > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> -Scott > > >> > > >> - > > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > > >> ___ > > >> Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > >> Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > >> Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > >> > > >> > > > > > > - > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > > > ___ > > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > > > > - > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > > ___ > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] .classpath file in Subversion
I've been using Intellij 7's maven support to generate the project files then switching back to Intellij 6 to actually use them (still too many bugs in 7). Don't mind what happens with the eclipse files as I'm barely aware they exist :). On the commons logging front, we should probably stick with whatever the main Spring dependency is. I doubt if it matters that much though. Personally I'd scrap it and switch to slf4j to reduce the number of sections in my pom files :). Does anyone know if you can set global exclusions with maven 2? Scott Battaglia wrote: > Ray Krueger wrote: >> Ooh, here's an idea! >> Have Maven generate a new .classpath file and check that in. >> > The plugin nicely doesn't generate one for the parent POM. Otherwise we > wouldn't still be having this discussion ;-) > The way to handle the flat structure is extremely kludgy: > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin/reactor.html (its > on the bottom). > > The easiest thing for me to do now is just update the .classpath file > locally and not check it in. I'll let the more core team figure out the > whole Eclipse project issue and then just update to whatever you guys > decide ;-) > > On a completely different side note, in updating the .classpath file, > we're depending on commons-logging 1.0.4. Should we upgrade to 1.1? > > -Scott -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] .classpath file in Subversion
Ray Krueger wrote: > Ooh, here's an idea! > Have Maven generate a new .classpath file and check that in. > The plugin nicely doesn't generate one for the parent POM. Otherwise we wouldn't still be having this discussion ;-) The way to handle the flat structure is extremely kludgy: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin/reactor.html (its on the bottom). The easiest thing for me to do now is just update the .classpath file locally and not check it in. I'll let the more core team figure out the whole Eclipse project issue and then just update to whatever you guys decide ;-) On a completely different side note, in updating the .classpath file, we're depending on commons-logging 1.0.4. Should we upgrade to 1.1? -Scott > > On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm not trying to get into a discussion on how one should use Eclipse >> (if I was working with a multi-module project I'd actually use IDEA). >> My point was that this behavior and Eclipse project structure would be >> different then what it is now by using mvn eclipse:eclipse. >> >> My immediate need is to get Eclipse to have the appropriate >> dependencies and I offered to put the correct version into Subversion. >> Anything beyond that scope is a different discussion. >> >> -Scott >> >> Ray Krueger wrote: >> >>> Why isn't it? >>> >>> If you're only interested in working on core then... >>> cd core >>> mvn eclipse:eclipse >>> >>> >>> >>> On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Executing mvn eclipse:eclipse creates projects for each of the modules, which is probably not what we want. -Scott Ray Krueger wrote: > I think the .classpath files should be removed. They are doomed to be > stale. > The project is now built with maven2 completely. Maven can create the > .classpath files as needed. > > Executing "mvn eclipse:eclipse" from the project root will create > everything needed. > > > On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I'm doing some work on some of the JIRA issues assigned to me (finally >> getting a chance) and I checked out the project and noticed that the >> .classpath was referring to Spring 1.2.9 while the pom refers to 2.0.6. >> Anyone have any issues if I update the .classpath file to reflect the >> latest Spring version? >> >> Thanks >> -Scott >> >> - >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ >> ___ >> Home: http://acegisecurity.org >> Acegisecurity-developer mailing list >> Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer >> >> >> >> > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer >>> - >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ >>> ___ >>> Home: http://acegisecurity.org >>> Acegisecurity-developer mailing list >>> Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer >>> >>> >> - >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ >> ___ >> Home: http://acegisecurity.org >> Acegisec
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] .classpath file in Subversion
I'm with you on the IDEA thing of course :) I see you're point on the eclipse plugin. Unfortunately it lacks an "eclipse:classpath" goal, there is only "eclipse:eclipse" which generates a .project file as well. For an IDEA project you can do "idea:module" or "idea:idea", you don't get the same functionality for eclipse (but isn't that always the case :P). Ooh, here's an idea! Have Maven generate a new .classpath file and check that in. On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not trying to get into a discussion on how one should use Eclipse > (if I was working with a multi-module project I'd actually use IDEA). > My point was that this behavior and Eclipse project structure would be > different then what it is now by using mvn eclipse:eclipse. > > My immediate need is to get Eclipse to have the appropriate > dependencies and I offered to put the correct version into Subversion. > Anything beyond that scope is a different discussion. > > -Scott > > Ray Krueger wrote: > > Why isn't it? > > > > If you're only interested in working on core then... > > cd core > > mvn eclipse:eclipse > > > > > > > > On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Executing mvn eclipse:eclipse creates projects for each of the modules, > >> which is probably not what we want. > >> > >> -Scott > >> > >> Ray Krueger wrote: > >> > >>> I think the .classpath files should be removed. They are doomed to be > >>> stale. > >>> The project is now built with maven2 completely. Maven can create the > >>> .classpath files as needed. > >>> > >>> Executing "mvn eclipse:eclipse" from the project root will create > >>> everything needed. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > I'm doing some work on some of the JIRA issues assigned to me (finally > getting a chance) and I checked out the project and noticed that the > .classpath was referring to Spring 1.2.9 while the pom refers to 2.0.6. > Anyone have any issues if I update the .classpath file to reflect the > latest Spring version? > > Thanks > -Scott > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > >>> - > >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > >>> ___ > >>> Home: http://acegisecurity.org > >>> Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > >>> Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > >>> > >>> > >> - > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > >> ___ > >> Home: http://acegisecurity.org > >> Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > >> Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > >> > >> > > > > - > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > > ___ > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Home: http://a
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] .classpath file in Subversion
I'm not trying to get into a discussion on how one should use Eclipse (if I was working with a multi-module project I'd actually use IDEA). My point was that this behavior and Eclipse project structure would be different then what it is now by using mvn eclipse:eclipse. My immediate need is to get Eclipse to have the appropriate dependencies and I offered to put the correct version into Subversion. Anything beyond that scope is a different discussion. -Scott Ray Krueger wrote: > Why isn't it? > > If you're only interested in working on core then... > cd core > mvn eclipse:eclipse > > > > On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Executing mvn eclipse:eclipse creates projects for each of the modules, >> which is probably not what we want. >> >> -Scott >> >> Ray Krueger wrote: >> >>> I think the .classpath files should be removed. They are doomed to be stale. >>> The project is now built with maven2 completely. Maven can create the >>> .classpath files as needed. >>> >>> Executing "mvn eclipse:eclipse" from the project root will create >>> everything needed. >>> >>> >>> On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> I'm doing some work on some of the JIRA issues assigned to me (finally getting a chance) and I checked out the project and noticed that the .classpath was referring to Spring 1.2.9 while the pom refers to 2.0.6. Anyone have any issues if I update the .classpath file to reflect the latest Spring version? Thanks -Scott - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer >>> - >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ >>> ___ >>> Home: http://acegisecurity.org >>> Acegisecurity-developer mailing list >>> Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer >>> >>> >> - >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ >> ___ >> Home: http://acegisecurity.org >> Acegisecurity-developer mailing list >> Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer >> >> > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] .classpath file in Subversion
Why isn't it? If you're only interested in working on core then... cd core mvn eclipse:eclipse On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Executing mvn eclipse:eclipse creates projects for each of the modules, > which is probably not what we want. > > -Scott > > Ray Krueger wrote: > > I think the .classpath files should be removed. They are doomed to be stale. > > The project is now built with maven2 completely. Maven can create the > > .classpath files as needed. > > > > Executing "mvn eclipse:eclipse" from the project root will create > > everything needed. > > > > > > On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I'm doing some work on some of the JIRA issues assigned to me (finally > >> getting a chance) and I checked out the project and noticed that the > >> .classpath was referring to Spring 1.2.9 while the pom refers to 2.0.6. > >> Anyone have any issues if I update the .classpath file to reflect the > >> latest Spring version? > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Scott > >> > >> - > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > >> ___ > >> Home: http://acegisecurity.org > >> Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > >> Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > >> > >> > > > > - > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > > ___ > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] .classpath file in Subversion
Executing mvn eclipse:eclipse creates projects for each of the modules, which is probably not what we want. -Scott Ray Krueger wrote: > I think the .classpath files should be removed. They are doomed to be stale. > The project is now built with maven2 completely. Maven can create the > .classpath files as needed. > > Executing "mvn eclipse:eclipse" from the project root will create > everything needed. > > > On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm doing some work on some of the JIRA issues assigned to me (finally >> getting a chance) and I checked out the project and noticed that the >> .classpath was referring to Spring 1.2.9 while the pom refers to 2.0.6. >> Anyone have any issues if I update the .classpath file to reflect the >> latest Spring version? >> >> Thanks >> -Scott >> >> - >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ >> ___ >> Home: http://acegisecurity.org >> Acegisecurity-developer mailing list >> Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer >> >> > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] .classpath file in Subversion
I think the .classpath files should be removed. They are doomed to be stale. The project is now built with maven2 completely. Maven can create the .classpath files as needed. Executing "mvn eclipse:eclipse" from the project root will create everything needed. On 9/10/07, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm doing some work on some of the JIRA issues assigned to me (finally > getting a chance) and I checked out the project and noticed that the > .classpath was referring to Spring 1.2.9 while the pom refers to 2.0.6. > Anyone have any issues if I update the .classpath file to reflect the > latest Spring version? > > Thanks > -Scott > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
