Re: [Acme] vestige of certificate GET

2018-11-06 Thread Daniel McCarney
>
>  I’m under the impression that plain GET for certificates is not to be
> part of the principal ACME spec; should the above, then, be removed?


Good catch, I agree. It doesn't look like EKR/Richard's PR (#467) covers
this so I opened another: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/468

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 7:15 AM Felipe Gasper 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Draft 16 has this:
>
> -
>An ACME client MAY attempt to fetch the certificate with a GET
>request.  If the server does not allow GET requests for certificate
>resources, then it will return an error as described in
> Section 6.3
> .
>On receiving such an error, the client SHOULD fall back to a POST-as-
>GET request.
> -
>
> From what I can discern from this list’s most recent posts on the
> topic, I’m under the impression that plain GET for certificates is not to
> be part of the principal ACME spec; should the above, then, be removed?
>
> -FG
> ___
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
___
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme


[Acme] vestige of certificate GET

2018-11-06 Thread Felipe Gasper
Hi all,

Draft 16 has this:

-
   An ACME client MAY attempt to fetch the certificate with a GET
   request.  If the server does not allow GET requests for certificate
   resources, then it will return an error as described in 
Section 6.3
.
   On receiving such an error, the client SHOULD fall back to a POST-as-
   GET request.
-

From what I can discern from this list’s most recent posts on the 
topic, I’m under the impression that plain GET for certificates is not to be 
part of the principal ACME spec; should the above, then, be removed?

-FG
___
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme