Re: [Acme] Tightening up the PEM cert chain type
> On Sep 19, 2018, at 14:40, Richard Barnes wrote: > > 1. Forbid explanatory text > 2. Require the "strict” format Totally reasonable change. spt ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
Re: [Acme] Tightening up the PEM cert chain type
>Chairs: OK to handle this on the same "comments-by-Friday" basis as the >GET-as-POST PR? Yes. ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
[Acme] Tightening up the PEM cert chain type
FYI: In response to a GitHub issue[1], I have filed a PR [2] to tighten up the definition of the application/pem-certificate-chain media type in two ways: 1. Forbid explanatory text 2. Require the "strict" format Chairs: OK to handle this on the same "comments-by-Friday" basis as the GET-as-POST PR? --Richard [1] https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/issues/446 [2] https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/452 ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme